Live data from Hacker News

Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

npr.org

381–390 of 809 posts

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#381

Slack is great. The valuation makes sense and I wish them continued success. All the integrations, and workflows that Slack has enabled for our company make us more productive. I would hate to go back to what came before it. IRC is complete trash and I don't know why anyone would use it in the same sentence as Slack. UX matters. It matters A LOT.

Why are we comparing Slack to IRC, a product that came out in 1988?

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#382
post #189

Just throwing out there but has Slack genuinely improved the work lives of anybody? I've used it for my past two jobs and have yet to find a way of using it that doesn't destroy my productivity or make me genuinely afraid of receiving a message and being thrown off what I was doing.

Use DND. If i'm being productive i always pause notifications.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#383
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> and they didn't need to bend or break laws to succeed. I agree. There is no law against half-assed, bloated Electron based desktop software that can bring even recent hardware to its knees.

Why does anyone use the app instead of the site?

Using lots of browser tabs instead of applications appears to me to be a step backward in usability. Instead of relying on the window manager to organise your work, you add cognitive load instead.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#384

Slack is great. The valuation makes sense and I wish them continued success. All the integrations, and workflows that Slack has enabled for our company make us more productive. I would hate to go back to what came before it. IRC is complete trash and I don't know why anyone would use it in the same sentence as Slack. UX matters. It matters A LOT.

You have every right to think that Slack is amazing and that IRC is "complete trash" (although I completely disagree) - but please don't attribute it to UX.

UX isn't just graphical design, it's also feeling responsive, fast, and accessible. Something that Slack, in my opinion, gets horribly wrong.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#385
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Slack also has a disastrous "feature" wherein any user can cause the SlackBot to send a message to another user. In an open instance (which Slack seems wont to discourage), this means that a user can easily impersonate another user and purport to be sending messages in an official capacity. Could you tell me more about that? How is that done and is there a way for workspace owners to prevent it?

It's not as disastrous as this person makes it seem. It's a rest call you can use to have slackbot do or say whatever you want for integration purposes. You can customize the name of the bot as well as its icon, which would allow you to "impersonate" someone. The slackbot has limitations in that it looks different from a regular user and will identify it as slackbot if you click on it, as well as tell you who created…

And since we're talking about Slack's use in business, if someone does that you fire them. It might be a problem for people using the free version to host public communities, but that's not Slack's target market.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#386

Slack is great. The valuation makes sense and I wish them continued success. All the integrations, and workflows that Slack has enabled for our company make us more productive. I would hate to go back to what came before it. IRC is complete trash and I don't know why anyone would use it in the same sentence as Slack. UX matters. It matters A LOT.

Why are we comparing Slack to IRC, a product that came out in 1988?

Why shouldn't we compare them?

IRC has probably 95% of the features slack has, is completely free and has been around since 1988. Seems like a logical comparison to make.

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#387
post #246

I love the software, though this kind of feels like the Dot Com bubble all over again.

I don't think people who say this were even around at the time of the dotcom bubble. There were public companies adding "tech" to their names and seeing their values rise 10x in a day. THAT was a bubble.

[deleted]

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#389

Congratulation to them. I think what they did is absolutely amazing and will be seen retrospectively as one of the biggest fads of history. - They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate. - They managed to change chat from a set of open protocols to a single closed app terribly written in JS. - They managed to make a lo…

>They managed to make a lot of people absolute convinced advocate of Slack

That's interesting. Any idea how could they possibly do that?

Re: Slack Is Going Public at a $16B Valuation

#390

Congratulation to them. I think what they did is absolutely amazing and will be seen retrospectively as one of the biggest fads of history. - They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate. - They managed to change chat from a set of open protocols to a single closed app terribly written in JS. - They managed to make a lo…

> They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate.

I experience quite the opposite. With in-person communication, people barge in, demand you drop what you're doing now and answer their question/conversation.

With slack, you can answer them when you need a break or have finished something up.

Post reply on HN