Undervalued Engineering Skills: Writing Well
381–385 of 385 posts
Re: Undervalued Engineering Skills: Writing Well
#382Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the guidance is very outdated. It's likely to confuse more than clarify unless you've taken the time to study modern resources. I prefer Bryan Garner's work, like his usage guides. There is a great episode of Lexicon Valley where the dustier advice from The Elements of Style is called out: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/against-strunk-white/i...
There's definitely stuff in there that is dusty for sure. Thanks for this.
Re: Undervalued Engineering Skills: Writing Well
#383Re: Undervalued Engineering Skills: Writing Well
#384This resonates with me. My writing is clear and concise, I'm proud of it, and it pays off because I can communicate effectively. I'm not sure I agree with the "undervalued", in so far that I see a _lot_ of people who are not able to write clearly, and they get ahead and along just fine. Many executives who I worked with wrote terrible emails (sometimes they leave out the negation, so I'm guessing whether they mean X…
Re: Undervalued Engineering Skills: Writing Well
#385there's a good book about writing in computer science called "Technisches Schreiben (nicht nur) für Informatiker"[1].
The appendeix contains a funny correspondence between an author and his publisher whether "FORTRAN" or "Fontran" is correct.
[1]: https://www.hanser-fachbuch.de/buch/Technisches+Schreiben/97...