Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 65.0 released

mozilla.org

381–390 of 422 posts

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#381
post #300

I’m a diehard Firefox user and supporter, but with every release there are still things I wait on the WebExtensions support to improve: 1. There’s still no full featured Tab Mix Plus possible with the current APIs. That’s been a big bummer for some years now. 2. The most downloaded session management extension now is still not as rich and good as the old XUL extension Session Manager (from mozdev). 3. I probably have…

Have you looked at https://www.basilisk-browser.org/ ? It's basically XUL Firefox w/o WebExtension crap (they played with WebExtensions and bailed). Made by the same people who make Pale Moon, it's basically a successor. The main downside, of course, is the XUL extension authors are unlikely to keep updating their extensions now the XUL is dead on OG Firefox.

I've tried the 64 bit version of Pale Moon several years ago and it didn't seem as performant as Firefox (could've been due to the setup and environment; I didn't bother to investigate deeper). The fact that many XUL extensions have been abandoned or have stopped development is a concern though. Thanks for the Basilisk mention. It may be a good alternative for older machines that the current Firefox doesn't support.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#382
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And then people will complain that Mozilla is nagging them for money. I doubt anyone likes the nag screen that Wikipedia pops down about 15 seconds into reading a page and it covering almost half the screen. Wikipedia has sufficient marketshare to survive despite that. The ads that mozilla shows are fairly privacy-friendly, much more than any other ads you'd find on most websites. That's an improvement. If you don't…

>And then people will complain that Mozilla is nagging them for money. I doubt anyone likes the nag screen that Wikipedia pops down about 15 seconds into reading a page and it covering almost half the screen. Users may not like nag screens, but I doubt they like the shitty ads Mozilla shows on the new tab page by default either. As long as the screen is easy to dismiss I don't see the problem.

Even easy to dismiss screens can disrupt the users flow similarly to how I mentioned that it interrupts my reading of the wikipedia page.

Wikipedia has, as mentioned, the market monopoly advantage so they can do as please, Firefox doesn't and can't afford to annoy users.

I would doubt users are more annoyed by ads, especially the type of ads that Mozilla uses, than nag screens.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the original poster, but I would recommend to anybody that they move to Fastmail.

My only concern with Fastmail is they're Australia-based and the government there seems rather hostile to privacy.

This is exactly why the new encryption laws are so detrimental to the Aussie tech industry.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#384
I really like Firefox containers. Having different containers for each of Google, Google G Suite, Hacker News, Twitter, and Reddit lets me have one browser open and keep cookies separate.

I started using Firefox again when I got a new Linux laptop last December (from Sytem76 - love it). After getting used to having containers, then I started also using Firefox again on my MacBook.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#385

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On all my Linux systems (NixOS), Firefox lags/skips while scrolling all the time. It's a deal breaker for me so I use Chromium, which scrolls without lagging. I read it is because Firefox does not use HW graphics acceleration on Linux, in general. This is both on a computer with the NVidia driver and one with the open-source radeon driver.

This is the exact reason I have not been able to switch back to FF, but on Windows. Enabling HW acceleration did not fix it.

I'm using FF on AMD and Intel GPUs, and works smooth

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We implemented 2 versions ago, however we wanted to do some user testing to make sure it wasnt going to break too many websites and annoy too many users (We ended up changing the behaviour based on those tests). It will ship and be enabled by default in Firefox 66, it will not have a whitelist of allowed websites but autoplay on all websites will be disabled by default (configurable obviously), if autoplay is blocked…

As a quick side note, I just want to throw out how grateful I am both as a developer and as a user that Firefox handled autoplay blocking in a sane way. - An actual notification the user can see and control, which means as a developer I can give people an easy way to re-enable audio if something breaks. - Actual user controls instead of an opaque algorithm I can't override that randomly decides for me on the fly whet…

Cheers, that very nice to hear

    > And the UI for adding exceptions is still really 
    > cumbersome -- as a developer I wish there was some 
    > way to whitelist domains from the notification bar 
    > without going into settings.
That was implemented last week :) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1517526 you should see it in nightly, and will be part of the release.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#389
post #379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean by the manual step for nativeinstall? It is risky if you don't trust us, which is why Mozilla won't let us do it automatically, so it has to be manual. What do you mean by imap and nmap? We already have separate binds for normal and insert mode (which is why you can type into text boxes ;) ). I think Ctrl-Z was bound to ignore mode in Pentadactyl. Now I think about it, I don't know why it isn't bound…

Sorry i immediately set editorcmd but the edit was for some reason posted as a sibling comment that I then deleted.(I couldn't reply immediately afterwards because this website didn't have a reply button for your comment then) Maybe ZZ could be stop then?

ZZ closes all your tabs and windows. `viewconfig nmaps` will show you all the normal mode binds, if you're curious.

I'm reasonably happy with "x" for stop.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#390

I just updated and immediately noticed two things that bothered me: 1. It added a new search engine (amazon.com.au) to my list that I'd culled down to just DuckDuckGo 2. It started recommending extensions for websites I visited Maybe I'm overreacting a bit but why does it feel like every time I update anything recently I then have to spend 5 minutes going through the preferences to make sure it hasn't changed anythin…

I was annoyed about the recommending plugins thing as well. It's quick to turn off if that's any help.
Post reply on HN