Live data from Hacker News

Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

mobile.nytimes.com

381–390 of 505 posts

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#382

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it actually is. Life critical systems should be small, fully open stack, fully audited, and mathematically proven to be correct. Non-critical systems, secondary information reporting, and possibly even remote control interfaces for those systems should follow industry best practices and try to do their best to stay up to date and updated. Most likely many modern pieces of medical technology have not been designe…

Does this distinction between critical and non-critical systems make sense for medical equipment? Displaying the information to humans (doctors and nurses) is probably life-critical. If the display is broken, it's not working. It's not like medical devices have an entertainment system like cars and airplanes.

The display and the business end of the equipment are critical and should not be network-connected (or even have USB ports, for that matter). The part that uploads to whatever big server should have updates all the time. The critical bit should either be connected to the non-critical bit by a genuinely one-way link (e.g. unidirectional fiber) or should use a very small, very carefully audited stack for communication.

This is all doable, but it adds a bit of BOM cost and changes the development model.

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#383

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disabled SMBv1 on the server. Good enough to protect our network share? Or is there some reason/benefit to disabling SMBv1 on client machines too? (I ran the simple powershell command on server: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2696547/how-to-enab... )

The main one is to have _all_ machines patched through windows update. That is what will protect you. SMBv1 is an outdated protocol, in which there have been some severe vulnerabilities disclosed in the last few weeks, hence why I recommended to get rid of it at the same time. That being said, the vulnerability being exploited here is in SMBv2, hence why patching all machines is crucial.

I notice that Microsoft is claiming the exploit is in SMBv1 in their patch description [1].

[1] https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4012598/title

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#384

While I can understand WikiLeaks position, I feel like it was incredibly short sighted and uninformed of them to release the code itself. Unless you believe that they are working with the Russian (and other?) governments to destabilize the west. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case.

My impression was hat the Shadow Brokers already had, or were about to release the tools which Wikileaks ended up leaking. Regardless, these should've been disclosed to the manufacturers under Obama's policies.

I would be curious as to the agenda of these "Shadow Brokers" it all sounds very Gibsonesque. Recent events have made Neuromancer seem more and more prophetic to me.

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#385
post #11

> "Microsoft rolled out a patch for the vulnerability last March, but hackers took advantage of the fact that vulnerable targets — particularly hospitals — had yet to update their systems." > "The malware was circulated by email; targets were sent an encrypted, compressed file that, once loaded, allowed the ransomware to infiltrate its targets." It sounds like the basic (?) security practices recommended by professio…

If you run a large installation of computers, taking updates can be a huge risk. Often they can break things, and then you're in the position of being blamed for running an update. Not updating can often lead to much higher stability. In previous environments I've worked that were "regulated", any change to the environent, such as a firmware upgrade, triggered an entire re-regulation process (testing, paperwork, etc)…

> If you run a large installation of computers, taking updates can be a huge risk. Often they can break things, and then you're in the position of being blamed for running an update. Not updating can often lead to much higher stability.

There is such a thing as staged rollouts for this exact type of scenario.

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#386
If anyone reading this was effected by this attack, please take this as an opportunity to start the journey to become "antifragile". If you are severely effected by this (mainly speaking about ransomeware) it means you lack backups and the ability to self-heal infrastructure. These attacks will only get more frequent and more sophisticated. So, start now.

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#387
Medical offices are notorious for having machines out of date, not properly secured, and not backed up. Just recently I wanted to get test results from a few years earlier from a previous doctor. Nope, the machine they were on runs a proprietary GE setup and it crashed. The same test a few years earlier? The hospital lost them and had no record of them being done. A different test I had done a month ago was hooked up to an aging Windows XP machine. Yes, it was networked, though I'm unsure if it was intranet only (I doubt it).

In the US, you have to manage your own healthcare. Get every result as a hard copy or on disk (in the case of MRI etc) and save it yourself. And back it up. That way you're prepared.

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#388
post #95

> "Microsoft rolled out a patch for the vulnerability last March, but hackers took advantage of the fact that vulnerable targets — particularly hospitals — had yet to update their systems." > "The malware was circulated by email; targets were sent an encrypted, compressed file that, once loaded, allowed the ransomware to infiltrate its targets." It sounds like the basic (?) security practices recommended by professio…

Karen Sandler has an interesting story about medical devices and how they are, literally, putting her life on the line. She's both a lawyer and a hacker, and you should hear the stories she tells about how people distrust her for this and think she's trying to trick them when all she wants to do is learn about the software and hardware that is keeping her alive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMKHqO28FcI

Wow, that video deserves more views than it has. Really interesting and relevant for a two year old talk.

Re: Cyberattacks in 12 Nations Said to Use Leaked N.S.A. Hacking Tool

#390

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Patriotism was temporarily necessary while we rapidly increased standard of living for ourselves, and didn't have enough resources to do it globally. In the early 21st century it was still a zero sum game on subdecade timescales. Now we have more than enough resources to provide basics for all 10 billion of us (and decreasing) so patriotism has largely been confined to friendly rivalry around sports and regional cuis…

16s? No Neuralink?

Only available on plus models.
Post reply on HN