Live data from Hacker News

_why is no more

twitter.com

371–380 of 421 posts

Re: _why is no more

#371

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ditto. Unless _why goes by multiple names in real life (which I suppose is possible), that's not him.

It is possible that Jonathan Gillette and _why worked in the same company, and _why used Jonathan's computer, or so.

To update, I've received a few anonymous e-mails with significant proof that the Jonathan Gillette theory is sound (though I won't go far as to say it's 100% certain).

Re: _why is no more

#372
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Someone outed him here: http://whoiswhytheluckystiff.wordpress.com/

Something doesn't seem right about that detective work - there's a Jonathan Gillette online who is a web developer in Harrisburg, PA who doesn't seem to be _why. Obviously it's likely that there's more than one Jonathan Gillette on the internet, but it seems odd to me that this other guy is also a web developer, with a decent online presence, in (somewhat) the same geographic area where _why is suspected to live, tha…

He mentions his friend Dustin in: 12 Oct 2002 http://www.advogato.org/person/whytheluckystiff/diary.html?s... This furthers the belief he is Jonathan Gillette as the band Jonathan Gillette was in contains a Dustin. With all the other evidence I am calling this a case closed. It is interesting to note how different he seems from _why. Maybe the Fight Club analogy (read above) is not too far from the truth.

Re: _why is no more

#373
post #322
post #293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The wikipedia page shows an image of him apparently giving a public speech. If his privacy was so precious to him I don't think he would do things like that. Hence I would say this was just a little game - and he lost.

privacy must be respected, and actually should be enforced by everybody, including you. meaning: even if you know him, you should pretend that he is anonymous person, disconnecting the _why persona from the real-life person. for example, if you know him, and you hire him, you still should ignore the on-line _why persona, because for privacy purposes, it is separate, anonymous entity, and you should not connect it to…

Uggh. If privacy must be protected by civic order it's already a lost cause. All these good people standing up for privacy--it only serves to increase the market value of violations.

Honestly, I think it's better to throw out the notion of digital privacy entirely and start pushing the notion of universal visibility, and accountability. Once everyone is naked, we'll stop obsessing over the naughty bits.

Re: _why is no more

#374
post #293
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did he literally put out a challenge or do you actually see a person's privacy as a game?

The wikipedia page shows an image of him apparently giving a public speech. If his privacy was so precious to him I don't think he would do things like that. Hence I would say this was just a little game - and he lost.

a public speech where? a programming language conference. No disrespect intended to anyone here, but making a presentation at the technical conference does not make one either a public figure.

Re: _why is no more

#375
post #365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another one: http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/scene.org/music/groups/starving_but... look at the .txt file : both Jonathan Gillette and Kylie Gillette are present ...

And if that isn't enough, here is their CD. http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/tcwwak Note the familiar figure on the cover.

And in this one (sorry google cache), hosted on hobix.com, both "The Child who .." and the "Starving but Happy" are mentioned: http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:A9WqFnIuA04J:b2thefroth....

Re: _why is no more

#376
post #365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another one: http://ftp.df.lth.se/pub/scene.org/music/groups/starving_but... look at the .txt file : both Jonathan Gillette and Kylie Gillette are present ...

And if that isn't enough, here is their CD. http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/tcwwak Note the familiar figure on the cover.

And here we are: Miss Trudy (who I definitively know being _why's wife, as I uncovered this some years ago, and _why asked me to not say anything), is definitively saying she belongs to "The Child Who was ..." :

http://www.e6townhall.com/archive/index.php/t-2187.html

Re: _why is no more

#377

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe you could try http://friendpaste.com :)

does this run code? take another look at codepad. It's not just a pastebin.

take a look on friendpaste this isn't just a pastebin too. For code running. Yes I missed the point. Maybe because I don't see how it could works on most code if you can't import your own modules. I would be happy to participate to such project. Is sourcecode of codepad around ?

Re: _why is no more

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

does this run code? take another look at codepad. It's not just a pastebin.

take a look on friendpaste this isn't just a pastebin too. For code running. Yes I missed the point. Maybe because I don't see how it could works on most code if you can't import your own modules. I would be happy to participate to such project. Is sourcecode of codepad around ?

OK, it's a pastebin with embedding and revisions. How is that not "just a pastebin"?

Oh, nevermind, it's a #nosql site. I withdraw my argument.

Re: _why is no more

#379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe you could try http://friendpaste.com :)

does this run code? take another look at codepad. It's not just a pastebin.

Oh please! realtime discussions, revsions & more. Maybe you should be more attentive rather than wanting to make your point. I already said, idea of executing code is interesting. but then something should be found to execute also custom modules. that's all what I said and I would be happy to play with this idea.

Re: _why is no more

#380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

does this run code? take another look at codepad. It's not just a pastebin.

Oh please! realtime discussions, revsions & more. Maybe you should be more attentive rather than wanting to make your point. I already said, idea of executing code is interesting. but then something should be found to execute also custom modules. that's all what I said and I would be happy to play with this idea.

Sorry. You assumed I was curious about PasteBins because I'm curious about sites that let you run code on them. Now, it turns out that I'm slightly curious about PasteBins. I think they're slightly more interesting than URL shorteners. They're not nearly as interesting to me as sites that let you run code on them, though.

FriendPaste is neat, but it's not as daring as letting people run a bunch of different languages on your server like CodePad does. I imagine one reason it's not open source is that they're relying partly on security through obscurity. I would be if I were running such a site.

BTW, I did check it out more in depth, and its python interpreter runs "import datetime" and "print datetime.datetime.now()" fine, but gives an error than an md5 library is missing when you try to run "import urllib2". So it supports some standard modules but not all.

Post reply on HN