Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_banking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-site_scripting
Except that Javascript cannot access that, unless some glaring design flaws have been made. If you disagree with me, and believe it can, I would just love to see a webpage that dumps out valuable data inside my browser. I'll visit it without any browser plugins using the same session I have been using for over a month, promise!
"Disable Javascript" option removed in Firefox 23
371–373 of 373 posts
Re: "Disable Javascript" option removed in Firefox 23
#372Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dumb lawers litter my web. Whining is the only thing I can do. Besides, even small bar often becomes huge bar on mobile.
Again, blame the web designers who don't even do enough diligence how others do the same. And demands of proper, obvious labeling is one of the better tools to stop companies from putting useless crap everywhere.
Regardless of the laws, though, when a site fails to function, it should tell you when cookies are the reason. It's not hard to do.
Re: "Disable Javascript" option removed in Firefox 23
#373I can't remember the last time I wrote an application that didn't rely on Javascript for even parts of its basic functionality. I simply don't understand why you would want to browse the web without JS enabled and the average user definitely would never turn it off except in error, causing them to think the browser is broken. Every single common-use browser on the Internet supports Javascript, there is no reason to a…
Some mainstream sites will load js from 20 (or more) sources, just to show you an article. Crazy. Every mainstream browser supports Flash, too - does that mean Flash is the way of the future? I run with NoScript, and it makes the web a quieter, more peaceful place.