Earlier quoted context omitted.
While not on the same level as these guys, I've done some similar stuff using Claude. This is a classic synergy example, where the output of human + LLM is far greater than just the human or just the LLM working on a problem. My experience has been that the LLM lacks fine grained judgement when it comes to allocating resources, or choosing a direction to work in. But once a direction is pointed out, it can do a deep…
> But with someone holding the leash i've been thinking about why we call them agent harnesses i know all analogies suck in different ways but here goes: coding agents are like horses. without a harness and bridle they'll the horse will do as it pleases -- a human can't travel very far and fast by foot but put a bridle and a harness on a horse, give it a bit of coaxing with carrot and stick, add in a bit a pointing t…
Claude's Cycles [pdf]
371–376 of 376 posts
Re: Claude's Cycles [pdf]
#372Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone ask "Hey how do I do this thing in python programming language" what are the chances that you will try to make up a solution, if you have never tried to learn Python? Just tell me..
Have you tried this with Claude? --- Q: How do I reverse an array in the Navajo programming language? A: I'm not familiar with a programming language called "Navajo." It's possible you might be thinking of a different language, or it could be something very niche that I don't have information about. --- As for your question, the chances go from 0 to 100% depending on how many languages I already know and whether I ha…
Re: Claude's Cycles [pdf]
#373Re: Claude's Cycles [pdf]
#374Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good points, interesting. I think this is probably neuroscience vs psychology. We can explain a lot with neuroscience, but two people with essentially identical brain chemistry can have very different psychology. There are people out there who have beliefs and cognition processes that I find completely incomprehensible despite having the same brain and even sharing a language. I'm not sure how I'd have a meaningful c…
But at some level, you can "just be" with the other organism. Eat some food. Make some dopamine. Hang out. I feed my dog. I exercise my dog. I exercise myself. I eat. We sit down together, I pet her. We both create oxytocin and perceive that positively when I pet her. Most animals map that to "safety" or "contentment". Survival needs satisfied for now. Who knows what that maps to for my dog, but we exist in a pretty…
I wonder how we would "hang" with an actual AI, though? I guess I'm assuming that it will be a meta-level above the chat and prompts. That's just the ocean it swims in, not it's actual consciousness.
Re: Claude's Cycles [pdf]
#375Earlier quoted context omitted.
For what we know, most AI labs have used a majority of artificially data since 2023. I had a discussion about a year ago with a researcher at Kyutai and they told me their lab was spending an order of magnitude more compute in artificial data generation than what they spent in training proper. I can't tell if that ratio applies to the industry as a whole, but artificial datasets are the cornerstone of modern AI train…
I find this very surprising, do you have any papers on the kinds of techniques that they use?
The latest paper from HF on synthetic datasets is a good starting point I think: https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceFW/finephrase
The intro contains a few paper that may interest you as well.
Re: Claude's Cycles [pdf]
#376Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you elaborate?
EDIT: probably not relevant, after re-re-reading the comment in question. Presumably littlestymaar is talking about all the LLM-generated output that's publicly available on the Internet (in various qualities but significant quantity) and there for the scraping.