Live data from Hacker News

The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

frommers.com

371–380 of 780 posts

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#371

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Believe it or not, I don't care what authoritarians feel about the 4th amendment that was designed to be read and interpreted free of the courts.

And how, exactly, are you certain of this intended design?

"shall not be violated" leaves no loopholes. Just like the second amendment:

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

"shall not be infringed" and "shall not be violated" do not leave loopholes. It's quite clear.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#372

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And how, exactly, are you certain of this intended design?

"shall not be violated" leaves no loopholes. Just like the second amendment: >A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. "shall not be infringed" and "shall not be violated" do not leave loopholes. It's quite clear.

I didn’t ask you what the words say; anyone can read them. I asked you why you believe, based on the historical evidence, that the Constitution isn’t supposed to be interpreted by our courts.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#373

I think I must be confused, but after reading many of the replies, I can't figure this out. Is the standard American perspective that one shouldn't have to show any form of identification to go through security, get on a plane, and travel anywhere within the United States? How does anyone associate your ticket to your identity?

My American perspective is unless I'm participating in an activity that definitely requires carrying and presenting ID, I don't need to.

Driving is such an activity. Transiting national borders as well. Maybe opening a bank account, but really it should be up to the bank if they want to see my ID.

If I'm travelling but not operating the vehicle, why should I need to carry and present ID? I'm pragmatic, and it's convenient to carry and present my papers to the nice officers, but I shouldn't need to.

Demanding ID when unnecessary is a hallmark of a police state.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#374
post #358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So it was never about security at all then, was it? Never was. I flew every other week prior to covid and haven't once been through the scanners. For the first ~6 years, I opted out and got pat down over and over again. Then I realized I could even skip that. Now at the checkpoint, I stand at the metal detector. When they wave me to the scanner, I say "I can't raise my arms over my head." They wave me through the m…

> The TSA was NEVER about security. It was designed as a jobs program and make it look like we were doing something for security. To a great extent, it is security, even if it's mostly security theater, in the sense that it is security theater that people want . A large portion, maybe even the majority, of travelers simply won't feel safe without it. I've had and overheard multiple conversations at the airport where…

Security Theater Blanket

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"shall not be violated" leaves no loopholes. Just like the second amendment: >A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. "shall not be infringed" and "shall not be violated" do not leave loopholes. It's quite clear.

I didn’t ask you what the words say; anyone can read them. I asked you why you believe, based on the historical evidence, that the Constitution isn’t supposed to be interpreted by our courts.

I answered your question. Your failure of comprehension is not my problem.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#376

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn’t ask you what the words say; anyone can read them. I asked you why you believe, based on the historical evidence, that the Constitution isn’t supposed to be interpreted by our courts.

I answered your question. Your failure of comprehension is not my problem.

You did not. This is the answer of someone who has lost the argument and knows it, but refuses to admit it. The door is that way; kindly let yourself out.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#377

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I answered your question. Your failure of comprehension is not my problem.

You did not. This is the answer of someone who has lost the argument and knows it, but refuses to admit it. The door is that way; kindly let yourself out.

Since you're pretending to be a lawyer and losing an argument I'll highlight the part that answers the question:

>"shall not be infringed" and "shall not be violated" do not leave loopholes. It's quite clear.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#378
post #104

I once told TSA this: "I lost my Driver's License, and the state won't issue another for a month maybe. I understand there's an extra screening pat-down." Before entering the porno scanners I put everything in my pockets on the scanner belt, and they didn't bother to pat me down. YMMV.

"YMMV" I've had my testicles squeezed, fondled, but thankfully, mostly avoided.

Don't tempt me with a good time.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You did not. This is the answer of someone who has lost the argument and knows it, but refuses to admit it. The door is that way; kindly let yourself out.

Since you're pretending to be a lawyer and losing an argument I'll highlight the part that answers the question: >"shall not be infringed" and "shall not be violated" do not leave loopholes. It's quite clear.

I am not pretending to be a lawyer and will happily send you my bona fides. Feel free to email me at otterley at otterley dot org.

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

#380
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

RealID is unrelated to citizenship. It's a proof of an address, akin to soviet-style "propiska", which was very important and hard to get without (it also affected ownership/inheritance). What's more fun is that even though they accept different types of residence, they mostly trust utility bills -- but to set up utilities on your name even for your personal home utility company will ask a lot of documents, including…

Real ID/Drivers License being a proof of address is laughable. In my state (NY) they accept the following as proof of address for getting a new Real ID: - Bank statement - Pay stub - Utility bill - Any other state ID with the same last name, which I can claim is my parent or spouse. I can change my mailing address on any of them with a few clicks online, no actual verification needed. What they do NOT accept as proof…

> I can change my mailing address on any of them with a few clicks online, no actual verification needed.

Yes, but you’d have to be able to retrieve mail from that address?

Post reply on HN