Live data from Hacker News

Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite phone hacking

arstechnica.com

371–372 of 372 posts

Re: Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite phone hacking

#371
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s still a valid question. We have this huge corporation that’s doing so many things, constantly lobbying for policy, obscene revenue all while people are exploiting the apk out of their OS. In fact, looking at the news this week, the same question applies to Microsoft and Apple as well. Are they too big and distracted to care about security?

For many experienced software engineers Microsoft has had a reputation for poor software engineering when it comes to security, reliability, stability, scalability for 30 years. Google generally has the reputation of doing much better in those areas. Not sure what would be objective measures to compare.

How about how easily spyware developers brag about being able to defeat the OS?

Re: Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite phone hacking

#372

> https://signal.org/blog/cellebrite-vulnerabilities/ There’s always the hope they are hit back: Cellebrite can develop solutions to automate the hacking of target phones, but in doing so their physical devices are exposed to being hacked as well.

ahhh what is this?

> The completely unrelated

> In completely unrelated news, upcoming versions of Signal will be periodically fetching files to place in app storage. These files are never used for anything inside Signal and never interact with Signal software or data, but they look nice, and aesthetics are important in software. Files will only be returned for accounts that have been active installs for some time already, and only probabilistically in low percentages based on phone number sharding. We have a few different versions of files that we think are aesthetically pleasing, and will iterate through those slowly over time. There is no other significance to these files.

Post reply on HN