Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

FFmpeg moves to Forgejo

code.ffmpeg.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

371–374 of 374 posts

Re: FFmpeg moves to Forgejo

#371

Post by ipaddr »

KingMob wrote: post #329
ipaddr wrote: post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't use the most used platform for blogging reach in 2025 because .0000001% of users are people you hate? Sounds silly. Don't use wordpress because a store I don't like uses it? I hate to tell you this but friend and foe are using Google search.. time to move on.

The difference is the Substack owners have actively recommended Nazi substacks, and ignored calls to deplatform Nazi content. They're not a common carrier like the phone company, and could kick off the nazis at any moment if they wanted to.

If they kicked off Nazis wouldn't that make them Nazis. Isn't that exactly what they would do.

Re: FFmpeg moves to Forgejo

#372

Post by usr1106 »

Aachen wrote: post #287
usr1106 wrote: post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not for Sailfish's not so up to date Firefox either.

Do we know if Anubis is unwilling to fix that, or if they've just not opened a bug report yet?

No problem for x. Not for y either.

Why would anybody open a bug report?

(Even/odd confusion of number of negations maybe:) )

I guess it became clear from other comments that disabling JavaScript causes the problem. An experimental fix exists for that.

Re: FFmpeg moves to Forgejo

#373

Post by jraph »

account42 wrote: post #356
jraph wrote: post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like most tech companies with their ads and and tracking.

We should have higher standards than "usual big tech dark patterns" for our open source project infrastructure though.

100% agree. I wish people ranted about it more for the actual big tech dark patterns though. Here we are not even close IMHO.

Re: FFmpeg moves to Forgejo

#374

Post by KingMob »

ipaddr wrote: post #371
KingMob wrote: post #329

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The difference is the Substack owners have actively recommended Nazi substacks, and ignored calls to deplatform Nazi content. They're not a common carrier like the phone company, and could kick off the nazis at any moment if they wanted to.

If they kicked off Nazis wouldn't that make them Nazis. Isn't that exactly what they would do.

No. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Post reply on HN