Add "fucking" to your Google searches to neutralize AI summaries

Post by VertanaNinjai » Mon, Feb 03, 2025, 5:08 PM UTC

segasaturn wrote: post #67

bluetidepro wrote: post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For search, use Kagi. You don’t have to use their AI products at all to just use search.

If Kagi made a cheaper "no AI" tier I would be happy to subscribe. AI is costly to run, so even if you don't use the AI it's priced into your subscription fee - you're paying for an expensive product you don't want or use. e: according to Kagi's pricing page they do have a 'no AI' tier, but it limits your number of searches to 300/month. Seems like a totally arbitrary limitation, but its still better than forced AI.

Post by gloosx » Tue, Feb 04, 2025, 5:46 AM UTC

bobxmax wrote: post #372

gloosx wrote: post #366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You really like to shift things into personal attacks, huh? "It's dramatically useful for millions of people who are now much more productive than they were 3 years ago, including the programmers who have 10x'd their output." - anecdotally Your productivity cult is nothing new, anytime new quantity multiplier emerges, there's a freshman manager class like you who thinks quantity>quality . It is obvious from your comm…

Lol okay buddy. That's why there are literally millions of people spending money every month and upgrading because of how useful this is. But there's always some big brained ape on hacker news who thinks they know better and everyone is just riding the hype train. Nearly half of Google engineers' outputs are coming from AI generated code, but you obviously know better than all of them.

Post by gloosx » Tue, Feb 04, 2025, 1:05 PM UTC

bobxmax wrote: post #374

gloosx wrote: post #373

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Millions of people spending money is not an indicator how useful something is. "Nearly half of Google engineers' outputs are coming from AI generated code" – let's take a look at the results: 30 discontinued products for the past 3 years, and just 1 new product: Gemini, which got it's glorious 10% market share. Now that's a productivity monster. Google is such a successful company now: they released 1 new product whi…

Totally. And where do you work that's so much more succesful? lol No, millions of people smarter and more succesful than you TELLING you it's useful is what makes it more useful. But when you're this arrogant it'll never register. Like I said, this is nothing new. It's like the arrogant boobs who thought smartphones were just a fad. Or the famous HN commenter who said Dropbox was pointless.

Post by __oh_es » Fri, Feb 07, 2025, 4:36 PM UTC

wokwokwok wrote: post #365

__oh_es wrote: post #336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My partner has dyslexia and finds forms overwhelming. Chatbots break this down and (I suspect) give the same feeling of guidance. As for specific examples NHS has some terribly overwhelming forms and processes - image search IAPTUS. Another example; I was part of a team that created a chatbot which helped navigate internal systems for call centre operators. If a customer called in, we would pick up on keywords and th…

> As for specific examples NHS has some terribly overwhelming forms and processes - image search IAPTUS. Are those example where a chatbot helps fill out the form, or just examples of where forms are hard? My image search did not find any results of AI chatbots that helped fill out the form for you. Do you have a direct link to a form by any chance?