Live data from Hacker News

Asteroid Impact on Earth 2032 with Probability 1% and 8Mt Energy

cneos.jpl.nasa.gov

371–374 of 374 posts

Re: Asteroid Impact on Earth 2032 with Probability 1% and 8Mt Energy

#371
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry could you expand / clarify this comment? What would make this more likely to hit near the tropics?

The risk corridor calculated here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2024_YR4_risk_corridor.pn...

Man if it hit india that'd go from a bad day to catastrophic.

Re: Asteroid Impact on Earth 2032 with Probability 1% and 8Mt Energy

#372
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We can land on it, drill and plant nukes inside to shatter it

Can't tell why I'm hearing "I could stay awake just to hear you breathin" in my head when reading the above

Someone finally got it! Congrats!

Re: Asteroid Impact on Earth 2032 with Probability 1% and 8Mt Energy

#373
post #142

It would have been scary even 2 years ago but by that time AI would solve that, maybe even turn it into some sort of mining operation

By 'solve' do you mean 'write a limerick about'?

I need this on a T-shirt.

Re: Asteroid Impact on Earth 2032 with Probability 1% and 8Mt Energy

#374

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anything that comes closer than the ISS (give or take) is going to interact with the atmosphere which is going to change the dynamics considerably. Generally something with the right orbit to pass 20m above the earth's surface is going to burn up in the atmosphere or hit the surface. The drag is going to kill its orbit fairly quickly. To have enough energy to come that close without doing so means it has enough energ…

If you come in at exactly the right angle (because you'll skip off the upper atmosphere if you come in too flat) and if you're fast enough, it's entirely possible to enter the atmosphere but fail to complete the aerobreaking maneuver, resulting in an exit from the atmosphere at above escape velocity. The stress of this maneuver is considerable, especially if you get as low as 20m above ground, so the object would nee…

A man-made object maybe but I don't think there are any natural objects with the right size+density to do it.
Post reply on HN