Live data from Hacker News

Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

theturnsignalblog.com

371–380 of 537 posts

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#371

All I look for is a USB connection to the simple stereo, plug my phone in and mount it on the dash. I fail to see why I have to deal with the additional cognitive load of an other interface that WILL go wrong when I already have a perfectly good one in my pocket. (No, I don't even want Bluetooth, ugh).

I also prefer this, but I find that lots of cars for some reason end up with weird volume levels for turn-by-turn compared to the music. Have you found a bullet proof way of adjusting this?

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#372

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>so the most sustainable design is one where the software is easily seperable and replaceable from the core durable item. No, the most realistically sustainable design is one where the software is built into the durable item and not connected to the internet, so it never changes and doesn't need to worry about security issues. You can keep using the thing until it fails from mechanical issues and can't be easily repa…

> No, the most realistically sustainable design is one where the software is built into the durable item and not connected to the internet, so it never changes and doesn't need to worry about security issues. How would that work in a car, where people expect map updates and streaming music or radio over the internet?

Just like that. Robust, simple software, open standards a r/w partition for map data. Having well-defined, narrow access to the outside world is much easier to secure and keep working.

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#373

It’s amusing when the author says “when the phone crashes.” My 2022 Subaru Outback head unit frequently crashes or is really unresponsive. My iPhone never crashes. Car infotainment systems are garbage. I’d never buy a car without CarPlay. It’s maybe the #1 measure I have for vehicle quality when I rent on vacation.

CarPlay is still wholly dependent on the car’s infotainment stack. If your Suburu’s system is crashing, CarPlay can’t insulate you from that.

If the car stack is doing less then crashes are not as likely?

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#374

It’s amusing when the author says “when the phone crashes.” My 2022 Subaru Outback head unit frequently crashes or is really unresponsive. My iPhone never crashes. Car infotainment systems are garbage. I’d never buy a car without CarPlay. It’s maybe the #1 measure I have for vehicle quality when I rent on vacation.

Second this, had VW, GM and Ford cars, complete unusable shit without carplay, doubt the other car makers are any better. The insane lag to enter anything on google maps on my 2024 Yukon is ridiculous. Worse, the fact it makes me TYPE in the touchscreen instead of letting me do this on the phone is yet another reason to completely ditch it. Google could easily let me control it through the phone (as they do with yout…

My Renault Megane e-Tech uses an Android Automotive based OS, along with some Qualcomm chips to drive it[1].

Result is that it's smooth like a tablet, even with it's quite large 12" screen. Been very pleased with it so far.

It also supports Android Auto and CarPlay though, something I had as a requirement.

[1]: https://9to5google.com/2021/09/06/android-automotive-renault...

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

CarPlay is still wholly dependent on the car’s infotainment stack. If your Suburu’s system is crashing, CarPlay can’t insulate you from that.

I don't know about that - my Subaru head unit crashes a lot more when I'm clicking around in the Subaru programs, and it very rarely crashes when I'm clicking in CarPlay. My feeling is there are bugs in the Subaru provided programs, and very few bugs in the program that launches CarPlay and gives it control of the screen (probably because that is a very simple program). So it seems that the more features I use via ca…

I had/have a 2020 Subaru Forester and 2024 Subaru Ascent and both head units have completely frozen to the point removing the battery was the only fix (even the radio fuses didn’t reset the underlying computer).

It’s really quite a shame as they’re fantastic cars otherwise. But yes, it’s never CarPlay that does it.

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#376
post #34

There's an interesting gap when discussing carplay/aa. Cars from the 90s up until about 2013 can be easily fitted with a $500 head unit upgrade, and support carplay quite well. With the right tools, it can be done in about two hours right in your driveway. Cars from 2018 and up pretty universally support carplay, and it's generally quite well integrated into the car's infotainment system. But, between 2013 and 2017,…

> Cars from 2018 and up pretty universally support Carplay, and it's generally quite well integrated into the car's infotainment system.

I don't know what cars you drive, but they are not budget or Chinese. I recently rented a bottom-of-the-line Nissan '24 and just getting audio from my iPhone was a struggle - and there was absolutely no Carplay in sight. Most Chinese cars I've rented (all 23 or 24 models) have advertised Carplay, but what they really have is a half-baked phone mirroring, which maybe worked on ios11 or something, but definetely doesn't today.

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#377

It’s amusing when the author says “when the phone crashes.” My 2022 Subaru Outback head unit frequently crashes or is really unresponsive. My iPhone never crashes. Car infotainment systems are garbage. I’d never buy a car without CarPlay. It’s maybe the #1 measure I have for vehicle quality when I rent on vacation.

[deleted]

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or because they want to charge a subscription for "premium data" which nobody would buy if there was CarPlay.

You don't need premium data for online maps. Premium data is for sat maps, music and live camera views. Also at $10 per month it's actually quite cheap.

Which is $10 per customer per month more than they’d get if everyone was using CarPlay / Android Auto.

It’s been proven time and time again that vertical integration is a massive money earner and you can bet that if Tesla were to release a smartphone then support for that in their cars would be a software update that follows immediately after. But since there’s no plans for a phone, the next best thing is a subscription-based infotainment system.

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#379

Article is really about the unofficially called "Carplay 2", a deeper integration that Apple announced in 2022 but hasn't been heard about since. As the article itself says, CarPlay Original Flavor is a massive success, I'm in the " 79% of drivers only consider a car if it has CarPlay " (bye-bye GM!)

I sold my GM truck because of how horrible the head unit was. I am still driving my 8 year old f150 because the infotainment system works fairly well.

Re: Apple's risky bet on CarPlay

#380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine a world where Apple and Google (and others) worked together and made a open standard that is as good as what they both have today. Bluetooth but for cars. Such a missed opportunity.

This would be considered a trust worth busting.

Not if it's anything like the video standardization efforts. The result is royalty free and open source. Every provider and consumer benefits when the infra is open

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_Open_Media

Post reply on HN