Earlier quoted context omitted.
> more distance to cover for things like sewers, I don't know which one becomes more expensive per capita, but "more distance" is very simplistic metric. Think of how much money and time and coordination it requires to dig a 200ft trench somewhere in Manhattan. Street closures, permits with multiple organizations, coordinate with tons of utilities and other underground facilities, engineering surveys if you're diggin…
> I live in a suburb and I walk to one of three nearby ( That is an outlier, though. Not only are suburbs less dense and, obviously, services are not as close, but county and/or city regulations across the US are notoriously anti mixed use developments, which make things even worse.
Can you point me at data?
This is always stated as truth but I always question it and have not seen anything conclusive yet.
Personally I've never lived in a suburb where I couldn't walk to supermarkets and other stores (and I've nearly always lived in suburbs).
I think the outlier is the suburb from where one can't walk anywhere. Would love to see comprehensive data on this.