Live data from Hacker News

Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

nytimes.com

371–380 of 1001 posts

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#371

Biden pardons Trump. Outrage mitigated. Base can’t rage. Biden easily wins re-election.

I could see that happening for this charge. In the scheme of things, paying off a sex worker is a petty transgression. Many will have done worse at some point. Showing forgiveness will be a win for everyone.

But if one of the insurrection prosecutions makes it up - then it's hard to see it being pardoned. "Petty" is not a word that springs to mind when describing the events of Jan 6th.

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#373

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

In terms of tearing the country apart…I think you need to separate the nut jobs who idolize Trump from the right leaning folks who simply supported Trump mainly because he was on their side of the line and frankly not an elderly democrat who was a punchline before he became “The Alternative”. The nut jobs will create problems, the others will complain but not act. Overall the others far outweigh the nut jobs.

It's not 2016 anymore. civil war and the great divorce is mainstream

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#374

To play devil's advocate a little bit. From a structural perspective, it was pretty much impossible for the courts to recruit any jury that wouldn't be biased. Furthermore, the case was in New York, which is a very democratic city. I would be surprised if any jury picked from there wasn't biased and wouldn't have convicted him of any crime the judge put in front of them. To be perfectly clear, I am not a fan of Donal…

"Everyone in my home town knows and hates me" is one hell of an argument.

Are you calling NYC a "hometown"?

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#375

Nearly the entire point of the United States at its founding was that the law should apply to political leaders. We are overdue for setting the precedent of a former President being charged with a crime, and we ought to go back and charge a few other former Presidents with crimes while we’re at it.

Just need a mental gut check after reading this comment. Do people not think this is political?

Meh, he's an ex-president. Of course indicting him is political. Not indicting him would be also political. It's not like there's a "non-political" Oracle that will tell us the most impartial course of action.

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#376
post #84

Hacker News is better without unrelated political news.

The problem is that people draw the related/unrelated line very differently. The site mandate is intellectual curiosity, not political battle—but that still leaves quite a few stories with political overlap. If you look at https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html you'll see the phrase "interesting new phenomenon". The current story surely qualifies as that.

I've posted various explanations about this over the years - a bunch are at https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so.... Some good threads to start with might be https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21607844 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22902490. Also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17014869, which shows how far back political discussion goes on HN, as well as the argument about politics on HN.

If anyone reads those past explanations and has a question about this that I haven't answered there, I'd be happy to take a crack at it.

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#377
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This also happened before he was a sitting president, so all the stuff about “Bush Iraq war crimes” and “Nixon’s burglary” and similar historical presidential baggage is mostly irrelevant, at least in terms of new precedent. The social/civil consequences of this sort of criminal indictment before election is enough to kill a presidential campaign and has enough times in history. As it should be. This is behaviour bef…

[flagged]

What isn't kosher about it?

Trump is being indicted by a grand jury, not the DA. Half the people in his orbit have done time in prison for committing crimes that just happened to benefit him.

Many top Democrats are fuming?

Name them.

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't that just give over power to prosecutors to pick who you get to vote for?

[flagged]

I almost wish HN had emoji reactions for comments. Upvote/downvote doesn't quite cut it when what this comment really needs is just an eyeroll emoji, possibly paired with "OK Boomer".

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#379

This seems like an obvious call to civil war when we jail an ex-president who is the frontrunner for the next election. Jailing a person who could as likely as not be be supported by a majority of voters for the presidency would probably be the single most anti-democratic act to ever occur in the US. I never thought we could outdo secret trials, but here we are, doing a speedrun into total collapse. I'm just astounde…

This seems like an obvious call to civil war when we jail an ex-president who is the frontrunner for the next election Yeah, we should just let politicians get away with criminal activity because of some vague concern that civil war is going to break out. the centrist blob thinks that they can get away with this utilizing a largely right-wing military, an extremely right-wing police force, and a extremely well-armed…

[deleted]

Re: Grand jury votes to indict Donald Trump

#380
Banks collapse. Weakening of the dollar. Former American president indicted. Plots to pause and inhibit AI technologies development through petition. Never ending rain and gloom on the west coast. School shootings.

I am not one for conspiracy but it really does not seem like the tides are moving in the United States favor right now.

Why does every day feel like we are getting closer to some kind of tipping point? Into what I don’t know, but I’m hoping we don’t get to a point where there’s no going back.

It is hard not to read this as politically motivated. A lot of this crowd tends to lean excessively left, but I would urge you to be aware of the broader geopolitical considerations of what is at hand here.

Post reply on HN