Live data from Hacker News

DPReview.com to close

dpreview.com

371–380 of 387 posts

Re: DPReview.com to close

#371
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is one more use case not covered by smartphones but actually covered by fixed-lens cameras - taking photos in rainy weather (which in some parts of the world is hard to avoid) or underwater. While there are waterproof smartphones, capacitive touchscreen becomes unusable as soon as it catches even a few drops of rain or water from wet fingers. A camera like Fujifilm XP140 works well in rain as long as there are…

Smartphones don't really work for underwater photography. Even the water resistant models have very limited depth ratings so to take them scuba diving you need a strong housing, just as with any other camera. There are underwater housings available for a few smartphone models but controlling anything through the touch screen is problematic, the small lenses and sensors don't work well in dim light, and there isn't a…

Any thoughts on the various action cameras for underwater? I've got an inexpensive (not GoPro) one that I've taken diving. It's just in looping video mode, cutting a new clip every few minutes, and could certainly use additional lighting. If I want stills, I just grab them from a freeze frame.

While I'm starting to get more into diving, I don't want to just throw money at other goodies before I know what they'll do for me.

Re: DPReview.com to close

#372
post #340
post #297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ArchiveTeam are planning on working on one, they probably welcome help: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/DPReview

Good, but from previous experience they don't make these archives available to the general public.

AFAIK this is mostly incorrect. First the crawler archive URLs to files in WARC format, which are uploaded to archive.org, which then imports the files into the Wayback Machine. For ArchiveBot jobs, you can find the WARC files for the completed jobs for any domain from the ArchiveBot completed jobs website. For other types of jobs, including custom ones like DPReview.com the process is similar but involves more machines due to their more distributed crawling process. It all ends up in the Internet Archive Wayback Machine though.

https://archive.fart.website/archivebot/viewer/ http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=ArchiveBot

Re: DPReview.com to close

#373
post #372
post #340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good, but from previous experience they don't make these archives available to the general public.

AFAIK this is mostly incorrect. First the crawler archive URLs to files in WARC format, which are uploaded to archive.org, which then imports the files into the Wayback Machine. For ArchiveBot jobs, you can find the WARC files for the completed jobs for any domain from the ArchiveBot completed jobs website. For other types of jobs, including custom ones like DPReview.com the process is similar but involves more machi…

Woops, forgot the end bit. There is only one non-public archiving job that I know of, and that is for YouTube videos only.

Re: DPReview.com to close

#374
post #295

ArchiveTeam are starting a project to put this on archive.org, I expect they will welcome help. https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/DPReview

What does help look like?

Pastebin lists of URLs that you know of and send the links to them to the IRC channel.

There may also be a bunch of coding to do, I don't know enough about ArchiveTeam to tell what needs doing, but its probably either URL enumeration or similar.

Also because of rate limits, the job will need a lot of IP addresses. These will be gotten by individual users running the Warrior. So if you have a suitable machine/network for that, please take a look:

https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Warrior

Re: DPReview.com to close

#375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cameras made after 2016 are so good in terms of image quality that you will not see any improvement in newer cameras. So upgrading is reasonable option only for those, who need better functionality, which majority of amateurs don't need.

It depends for what. There are still ways to go with video, but mostly only for people who care to colour grade their footage. I expect a significant proportion of people now are buying mirrorless cameras now almost entirely to shoot video so I expect it is a major consideration. Things like in-camera 10-bit raw video recording which is still fairly rare. Probably mirrorless cameras will start being able to shoot 5K…

It is pointless for casual consumers and professionals usually use cameras dedicated for video (Arri, RED), not hybrid camera.

Sure, there is specific group of enthusiastic folks on youtube that promote products consumed... by youtubers I guess?

Re: DPReview.com to close

#376
post #9
post #3

Dang, I'm actually surprisingly sad about this. DPReview is _the_ site for extremely detailed analysis of cameras. When I want to buy something I go through their report first, and it's always extremely informative. It feels like this kind of layoff is part of an end of an era. Amazon used to NEVER cancel projects that customers were using. They just straight up Did. Not. Do. It. I once had to get approval from my VP…

I do think times have changed though, DPReviews fortunes arguably have mirrored the fortunes of the ILC (interchangeable lens camera) market. The site (along with flickr.com...) was a daily visit for me 15 years ago at the height of the DSLR boom, but I honestly now can't remember the last time I checked. ILC/DSLR annual sales volume peaked in ~2010 I believe, and has rapidly declined ever since really, another victi…

> another victim of the rapid pace of improvement in smartphones

The only think which improved on smartphones was the marketing. Cameras on smartphones are still crap. (see Samsung moon shots).

Re: DPReview.com to close

#379
If all users requested their data and then pooled it together, we can build a simple version of DPR to keep things alive. And maybe even build it into a new/modern version. I've put together a quick google form to see if people want to try this plan https://forms.gle/2aGQtnQGw6SJCqVE7

Obviously there's much more content than user data.. but i'm sure we can keep it alive too

Re: DPReview.com to close

#380

Wow... I've been reading their comprehensive reviews and news for over 15 years. DPR got me into DSLR videography as a hobby which I've spent well over $10k on – much of it at Amazon. This really sucks as I don't know of another source I consider as authoritative for objective, thorough reviews and analysis of not only product but technologies and trends. Super disappointed in Amazon for not at least keeping the 25 y…

screw amazon, lets keep it ourselves! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35284510
Post reply on HN