Live data from Hacker News

Coinbase S-1

sec.gov

371–380 of 736 posts

Re: Coinbase S-1

#371

Bitcoin made a lot of sense when I first read about it in 2011. Back then I feel like it was primarily used as an anonymous payment method. Think dark web/silk road type stuff. I certainly don't endorse that behavior, but bitcoin as a payment method made a lot of sense. Bitcoin makes 0 sense to me as an investment. It's pure speculation with no underlying intrinsic value. It's the Dutch Tulips 10.0 basically. And now…

At what point either in years or market cap or price per coin will you start to question your mental model of Bitcoin?

Not OP, but also a skeptic and here are my thoughts:

- Market cap is sort of a misleading stat. Microsoft's market cap is ~1.75 trillion, but it's p/e ratio is 34. So if they stopped reinvesting in their business, I'd be making 3% yearly on that investment with a hedge against inflation since they can just raise prices. A lot more goes into their valuation than that, but my point is that even if you are a huge skeptic of Microsoft's current valuation, the company is still worth a ton of money. I don't have a number, but I'd imagine that at $500 billion, pretty much every investor on the planet would think that Microsoft is a crazy steal. On the other hand, bitcoin's value is based on perception of its value and nothing else. The fact that some people are willing to buy in at $50k doesn't mean that every investor on the planet would think that bitcoin is a steal at 10k. There'd still be plenty of people who consider that price to be way to high as well. Since market cap is determined entirely by people willing to pay the most, it's hard to say what market cap means for something like bitcoin.

- I agree that there comes a point in time where even a skeptic has to give in. BTC really started to explode about 3 years ago. For me, that's just not enough time. Subjectively, after 10 years at reasonably high values, I'd probably have to reconsider, assuming it gets less volatile over time.

- The volatility is the main concern for me. Gold had a low around 100 and a high close to 200 in the past year of craziness, so it almost doubled. BTC went up about 10x from it's 2020 low to its recent high. Even Zoom and Peloton are only up ~4x from a year ago and this pandemic has fundamentally changed their businesses. I think if BTC got to a point where it didn't change more than 25% value in a year with a normal-ish economy, I'd have to reevaluate.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#372
post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gold is commodity. The financial system is an industry that provides goods and services. Gold is not an alternative to the financial system. How could it be? It's a completely different thing.

>Gold is not an alternative to the financial system. The modern financial system itself is in fact an alternative to gold

No it is not

Re: Coinbase S-1

#373
post #213

It's so weird to me that here, on hacker news people have such a hatred of coinbase. Coinbase is a YC company, and if some of the predictions are accurate, will be the highest valued YC company so far.

Might get downvoted but HN opinions are based on a minority of people who are more technical and well informed to the point of elitism IMO. When something becomes too mainstream and doesn't cater to the HN demographic, its success is irrelevant and potentially a liability.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#374
post #297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you "physically own" Bitcoin? Or what does "physically own" mean exactly? I kind of understand what "physically own" gold means, but not sure it means the same as "physically own" Bitcoin. Getting downvoted on this. I am not complaining about the downvotes, but seriously, please enlighten me...

If you use a local wallet to store your BTC, let’s say on a HDD, the the magnetic pattern on the disk that makes up the bits that represent your coins would be physically owning then. They can’t be retrieved any other way.

Bitcoin is not stored on your HDD, or on a local wallet. The "local wallet" simply points (or references) an address on the bitcoin blockchain. There are obviously more details, but you can do your own research.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#375
post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't need the nodes to agree on anything. If they don't agree, they drop off the network, and form their own chain with little to no hashing power, that will stagnate and die in short order.

You need a majority of computing power on the network to agree to actually do this which is what the parent means.

Bitcoin mining power is concentrated in China with about eight times the hash rate of number two United States, which in turn has a similar hash rate to Russia and Kazakhstan. Rounding out the top six, composing more than 90% of the total world hash rate, is Malaysia and Iran. Do you think these countries share the ideological goals of Satoshi Nakamoto's dream?

I have no doubt that a persistent 51% attack by a cartel of miners would make Bitcoin liquidity an indefinite hard zero for selected "owners" of BTC.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#376
post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> an unstable society or one facing high inflation What are the chances that in an environment where the USD is not usable, there is an available network and electricity that makes bitcoin usable?

> What are the chances that in an environment where the USD is not usable, there is an available network and electricity that makes bitcoin usable? The post you replied to said unstable or high inflation, not unusable. An unstable dollar will not instantly bring about the apocalypse, there are plenty of real life examples of unstable, high inflation currencies. The currencies took years to fully fail. Not to mention,…

In the 80s and 90s, Greek inflation was in the 15-20% range. Italy dropped to 5% more quickly but at the start of the 80s was in the 20% range.

In the 70s UK inflation was 10-20%.

that type of inflation is clearly bad for keeping cash, but not going to cause the collapse of civilisation. From about 73 - 80 US inflation was in the region of 10% per year.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#377
post #163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Okay, but you're talking about a completely different thing. Your Bitcoin balance, as it's shown in Coinbase's UI, is very different from your Bitcoin balance as it's understood by everyone else on the public blockchain; and that too only temporarily. There is nothing that Coinbase can do to permanently alter that supply of Bitcoin. That is what we're talking about. In contrast, the permanent US Dollar supply can and…

You're still wrong. Any exchange, due to the crazy lax regulations in the industry, can do this: * accept 100 bitcoins for deposit, giving their previous owners "100 claims against exchange X" in return * sell those 100 bitcoins * the new owners of those 100 bitcoins can roll down to exchange X and deposit them and accept 100 claims against exchange X in return * and the exchange can sell those 100 bitcoins once agai…

What you've described is also roughly how gold vs gold certificates work. You're correct that an owner of a gold certificate doesn't truly own the gold, and are exposed to extra risk on account of that. That being said, the value of gold has still remained stable/flat (relative to USD inflation). Also, every time you buy BTC, you can see the underlying transaction on the public block explorer. The day that stops being true is the day that Coinbase loses customers that consider BTC as a hedge on fiat.

You can still transact with Bitcoin using your own wallets against other exchanges/vaults. That's the entire point, Coinbase, like a (lower case "b") doesn't control the supply of Bitcoin, any more than precious metals bullions control the supply of gold despite their issuance of "gold certificates". Like any (lower case "b") bank, Coinbase can engage in bad behavior, and users are placing their trust in Coinbase to not do that. But those users aren't placing their trust in Coinbase to drive the monetary policy of Bitcoin, in the same way that the gold hoarder placing their gold bars in a Swiss vault doesn't really have to worry about the operator of the vault creating gold out of thin air. That fundamental fact drives the collective belief in the value of gold; as well as Bitcoin.

> * the new owners of those 100 bitcoins can roll down to exchange X and deposit them and accept 100 claims against exchange X in return

You can't deposit that purchased BTC at another exchange unless you cash out of Coinbase, because you don't have access to the private key, Coinbase does.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you "physically own" Bitcoin? Or what does "physically own" mean exactly? I kind of understand what "physically own" gold means, but not sure it means the same as "physically own" Bitcoin. Getting downvoted on this. I am not complaining about the downvotes, but seriously, please enlighten me...

All you need is a wallet address, which you can put on a USB stick or even print out on a card and store at home.

You dont need the wallet address, you need the private key. They are not the same.

Re: Coinbase S-1

#379

Argentina is a great example. I am an American and have been there many times. They have extreme inflation and regressive policies against USD or foreign currency. Take a look at https://bluedollar.net . Official rates are buy at 89.98 and sell at 94.98 (ARS). Unofficial rates are buy at 138 and sell at 143. That's a massive spread saying that the people on the street are willing to spend 35% more because they know t…

TransferWise Borderless accounts are permitted there for you to hold whatever currencies you want. [1]

Currencies that don't fall checks notes 26% in 4 days.

Generally folks look to switch from one problem into a solution, not into a different problem.

[1] https://wise.com/gb/multi-currency-account/

Re: Coinbase S-1

#380
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but that's only possible because of the underlying monetary policy, which is controlled by the Fed. In contrast, there is no way you can do this with (most) cryptocurrencies. The monetary policy of Bitcoin is dictated by the physical bounds of the proof-of-work algorithm. There is absolutely nothing that Coinbase can do to "create" more Bitcoin outside of just mining it like everyone else.

You can't create more bitcoin but you can create more USDT and exchange it for bitcoin.

That doesn't impact the value of Bitcoin. When you exchange USDT for Bitcoin, the loser isn't holders of Bitcoin, the loser is (potentially) holders of USDT. Exchanging USDT for Bitcoin doesn't create new Bitcoin.

Coinbase, as a marketplace, engages in the exchange of (potentially) bad tokens like USDT, as well as tokens like BTC that are provably finite. All of this is orthogonal to the fact that there is nothing hypocritical or internally inconsistent about holding and using Bitcoin or Ethereum and using Coinbase.

Post reply on HN