Live data from Hacker News

Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

axios.com

371–380 of 535 posts

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#371
post #99

Congrats to Giphy, but honestly it baffles me they are worth this much money. Do they actually bring in decent revenue, or was this all about eyeballs? Is this content even decently monetizable? Disclaimer: I am the jaded creator of Twicsy, a Twitter picture engine with many millions of visitors over its lifetime, and I apparently missed the boat on this trends and had to shut it down.

Read the privacy policy[1]. Think of Giphy images as a giant, organically shared version of web tracking software. Which complements the coverage of the FB Pixel[2] well, as it worms its way into privacy-conscious areas they might not have FB Pixel coverage such as private communications and security/privacy-minded apps. And without implementing something like a proxy server to pre-cache/sanitize images and strip tra…

Keen analysis, thank you.

Paraphrasing: emojis serving as web bugs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_beacon

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#372
post #6

Congrats to giphy I guess? But I'll be honest, any time I've ever used them as an extension in slack or anywhere, and tried to get relevant gifs, I got back some really bad results. I'll never fully understand why they're so successful short of just dominating the market through sheer popularity. I remember switching our team over to rightgif and the difference was astounding given the fact that giphy has millions up…

Rightgif looks great but sucks its not offered as an API and only as a slack bot

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#373

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Non-animated GIFs embed just fine, if that's what you mean. I just tried animated again, and sure enough, attachment.

S3 bucket, FTP folder, imgur... for your custom gif's and then you can paste a URL and get animation. No frills.

If I paste a URL, I get a URL, not an embedded image. Then people have to click it to see the gif, and they don't, so it defeats the purpose.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#374
post #188
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“Grok” is actually a cultural reference; it is a made-up word from a very famous science fiction book. When people use it, it looks the same to me like if they were using “Live long and prosper” in casual conversation.

I think one difference with "grok" is that, the way it's normally used, there really isn't IMO a perfect English replacement. To me at least, it implies a deeper and broader internalizing of something than saying "I understand it" or "I get it" necessarily implies.

“Comprehend” works, in British English at least.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Non-animated GIFs embed just fine, if that's what you mean. I just tried animated again, and sure enough, attachment.

Copy and paste it into slack instead

Uhh.... that creates an attachment.

I'm begging to suspect that there's a setting, hidden size threshold, or something involved.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#377
post #6

Congrats to giphy I guess? But I'll be honest, any time I've ever used them as an extension in slack or anywhere, and tried to get relevant gifs, I got back some really bad results. I'll never fully understand why they're so successful short of just dominating the market through sheer popularity. I remember switching our team over to rightgif and the difference was astounding given the fact that giphy has millions up…

I've had a 100% opposite experience. Compared to /gif, /giphy is far superior in slack.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> All these replies in the form of memes make me feel like I'm in the Darmok episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. If this is an ironic joke, it's a good one. If not, it's painfully un-self-aware. Because "feels like I'm in Darmok" is just an meaningless in isolation as "Temba, his arms wide."

Whether ironic or not, I found both the initial observation and your reply hilarious. Meme replies really are Darmok, and the meta nature of that is perfect.

Exactly.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#379
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd just like this trend of sending reaction gifs to end. People keep posting them in Slack all the time, but I find it about as appropriate as that brief time when all my uni teachers decided that it's hip to include rage comic faces into every other slide of every presentation. , yes I know, I'm fun at parties…

I can't grok this trend at all. All these replies in the form of memes make me feel like I'm in the Darmok episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. I'm grateful communication on MatterMost at my company has not seen the need for reaction gifs emerge; the wildest thing we have is a custom emoji of a dancing banana.

I the only time I need giphy is when there is no appropriate (custom) emoticon.

Giphy takes way too much space.

Also, why does Teams not have a :shrug: icon. Seriously?

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#380
post #58

Every time Facebook is buying something I feel sad and imagine Facebook like the black plague that will swallow that normal organism.

It's a great match. They're both hype-mongering companies which add no value whatsoever to society.

Agreed. This isn’t a whatsapp or an instagram, let Facebook eat it who cares.
Post reply on HN