Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that he should have dumped everything. Or at least, everything that didn't put individuals at risk. I get where he was coming from. But the people in charge of releasing stuff seem too clueless and/or deferential.
Dumping all of it online would have been like wikileaks, which I think would've been a mistake in that Wikileaks have been very open about aiming to use there releases to influence politics rather than merely releasing for the sake of knowledge e.g. "Maximum political impact" which does make them less credible (Aside from the dubious links to and decision not to criticise russia)
Do you have any evidence such a decision has been made by WL?
Does that decision apply to China too? I don’t see any wikileaks from China. What makes Russia special?
Perhaps these countries just aren’t that interesting to mostly English language WL?