As an outsider in another country, my impression seems to be that the quest for diversity seems to have turned into something of a religion in several cultures. In principle, as a solution to the problem I am principally all in favor of anonymous, faceless, no alma mater preference etc. interviews and application processes, and/or whatever other measures are suggested to remove the possibility of bias or unconscious…
The underlying assumption is that, if you average over a large enough population, there should be no underlying consistent difference between subsets selected on gender, race, or class, so a difference of outcome is presumed to be a result of difference of opportunity. The underlying assumption is definitely an assumption, but it seems like a good zeroth-order assumption to me.
What seems to be happening (the impression I get) is something analogous to this:
I have a game released on two mobile platforms - android and iOS. The iOS players are disproportionately scoring better than the android players.
Some are suggesting that the server is bugged/programmed to give iOS players better scores. I reject this.
Some are saying that the android user experience has conditioned those players to be satisfied with a low score. I reject this.
Some are saying iOS players are superior because they bought an apple product. I reject this.
My opinion that it is likely that the android release has a lot of performance issues which impede the player's ability to get a high score on that platform. I test this out by doing things like getting an android player to play on an iOS device, and checking if their performance improves. I do the reverse and check accordingly too. I do various tests on fps, input lag, etc.
If my experiment fails to show anything conclusive, I should be open to re-evaluating some of the things I rejected, but I refuse to do it out of zealous belief in my hypothesis. The answer must be optimization, I insist.
If my experiment succeeds, I should tweak the android code till the disparity goes away. Instead, I just hardcode +500 to the android scores and pat myself on the back.
There seem to be cases where the diversity disparity is "solved by hardcoding", and other cases where the data doesn't support the hypothesis, but there is an ardent refusal to accept it, as if it would be blasphemous to suggest otherwise. These are pretty much the only things I take issue with.