Live data from Hacker News

Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

linuxfonts.narod.ru

371–380 of 384 posts

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#371
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did anyone here manage to snag the code before the open source program was shut down?

Even if, it all depends on the terms of the license whether or not it could have been used to fork it or to base a free version of it. " Access to QNX source code is free, but commercial deployments of QNX Neutrino runtime components still require royalties, and commercial developers will continue to pay for QNX Momentics® development seats. However, noncommercial developers, academic faculty members, and qualified p…

I'm more curious to read it than to use it, though.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#372

I agree with all the points here. Despite all of this, Linux is still my preferred desktop. Why? The power! I can literally do anything with it. Including writing my own drivers/applications. Linux is my go to for doing things with zero crap. The same can't be said for Windows nor Mac. For me, this pro weighs very close to all of the cons I have experienced, experience daily, or will experience. Also as a desktop Lin…

“same can't be said for Windows” is subjective. I can do literally anything with my Windows. Including writing my own drivers/applications. And I can’t say the same about Linux. Not because that's impossible, but because I ain't a Linux developer.

Yeah that's fair.

Though I think there is more of an abundance of open source code on Linux that I can build off of and use freely. Windows utilities are usually closed source, hence not easily extendable.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#373
post #173

When visiting this blog post on my Android phone, the ads (or something) redirect me to a page with popups telling me my phone has a virus and encouraging me to install an app to 'clean' it, using Google branding on some dodgy domain. I seem to get a different one each time. Reported it at https://www.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/ but mentioning here so that others don't fall victim to it.

AV on Windows flagged this site as being malicious.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#374

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So just get a laptop with pre-installed Linux then...

Can you give me a recommendation?

I think that Dell do some. There is a company called System 76 that sells pre-installed Ubuntu boxes. I can't speak for either companies products having personally tried neither myself. I will be using one of them for my next purchase but I'm not sure which.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#375

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not for my stuff, I do have it (obviously) but it is definitely not worth sharing in the state it is in. Essentially it is a kernel, some userland device drivers and a rudimentary (but functional) network stack cobbled together from various bits and pieces. The toolchain was GCC and djgpp to bootstrap the development until it was capable of self hosting. It would need serious work (several man-months) before it could…

Wasn't there a patent on the message passing part of the QnX kernel?

I don't know. Frankly I don't give a rats ass if there is or isn't but if there is such a patent it would now be the property of RIM (or whoever gets it after RIM folds).

Message passing pre-dated QnX by a considerable time, they just did a really nice and clean implementation of it.

I'd absolutely support their copyright claims on their code, at the time their implementation was unique but I'd totally object against any patent claims, message passing systems had been used widely by that time, also at the kernel level. QnX may have been the first microkernel on that principle that received wide adoption because of the strength of the implementation.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#376
post #66
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-mini?product=MGEM2LL/A... Dont add any extras... its simply not usable on the net Hardware 1.4GHz Dual-Core Intel Core i5 (Turbo Boost up to 2.7GHz) 4GB 1600MHz LPDDR3 SDRAM 500GB Serial ATA Drive @ 5400 rpm Intel HD Graphics 5000 User's Guide (English) Accessory Kit

Maybe you have a faulty unit or are driving a very high resolution display. Otherwise at first glance that seems powerful enough to browse the net.

The memory's a little low but yeah that's an otherwise fine machine.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#377
post #328
post #224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does Intel make USB bluetooth sticks? If my laptop didn't come with a combo miniPCIe card I doubt the necessary antenna is there. In a desktop, I looked for mPCIe - PCIe x1 adapters with lots of antennas but I can't really find any in low profile. So... how did you do that?

For desktop, perhaps the Gigabyte GC-WB867D-I? Specs: http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5157 Price: https://pcpartpicker.com/part/gigabyte-wireless-network-card... It's basically an Intel 7260 Wireless-AC/Bluetooth chip plus a PCIe adapter.

Intel has a desktop version and it comes with both brackets! http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/wireless-products/dua... http://www.amazon.com/Intel-Wireless-AC-Desktop-Network-7260... Also, I will be adding to a somewhat old HP SFF so I am using the single PCI slot to add an additional USB header (Rosewill RC-100). PCI speed is plenty for USB 2.0.

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That simply isn't true. The Kernel is just one aspect of a Linux distribution. The part that is most responsible for supporting H/W. It has evolved a lot since 1996. Whenever I try I find the range of supported H/W is larger than Windows and (obviously) Apple. On other fronts things have changes radically: Video, Sound, 3D/GL, GUI (KDE, Gnome), printing, etc, etc.

It has all changed and it is all busted.

OK...

Care to elaborate? Are/were you using a Linux distribution yourself? Or are you just parroting what you hear elsewhere?

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

no please - I'm not talking about ctrl-C. I'm talking about CUA - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Common_User_Access Even on OSX, the bindings that are used are cmd-c and cmd-v. It is universal - if you have never used the terminal, vim and firefox on a mac... I really urge you to do that. you'll see what i mean.

You've got the causality reversed. The Apple Lisa introduced the command-Z/X/C/V keyboard equivalents for undo/cut/copy/paste, and they were kept with the Macintosh and Apple IIgs. IBM CUA and Microsoft Windows adopted them afterwards, adapted to the PC keyboard; I think Windows only adopted them with Windows 95 and NT4.

No, they were already there in Windows 3.x

Re: Major Linux Problems on the Desktop, 2016 Edition

#380

I stopped using Linux as my primary desktop OS around 2012. Until then I was an Arch user with my own desktop environment built on StumpWM and a hodge-podge of hand-selected tools. There was no Gnome or KDE in my setup. I liked it quite a bit. I used Ubuntu on my laptops since I wanted to spend less time administering drivers and arcane configuration formats. This is a good list. I just got tired of the configuration…

That's about the date I went back to Linux.

I really hated that the old KDE4 was just a clone of WinXP, and later Gnome until 2010 was just a clone of OSX.

Ubuntu's Unity is the first linux that's proud to be itself, and it shows.

Post reply on HN