It’s more than the C-Suite, it’s everyone who no longer has a knowledge specialty. Their domain is shattered and there is nothing left for them because before LLMs all they did anyway was search for companies to contract out an integration to solve a niche problem. 99% of the C-suites/boards are now this. Your IT guy, scrum master, Product lead, integration team, etc. Everyone who’s chosen to NOT understand because t…
> it’s everyone who no longer has a knowledge specialty. > Everyone who’s chosen to NOT understand because they can offload/contract-away their work and knowledge is under psychosis that LLMs know best. Right on the money! These people's ignorance was compensated for by other non-ignorant intelligent people in the organization who actually had knowledge of the domain and tools/techniques for problem-solving. The latt…
Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
361–370 of 383 posts
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#362Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#363Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And your point is? Using 30 years as a lifetime for solar panels is risky as there are no solar panels running for 30 years, not even close. Never mind the lifetime of the power wall battery and the inverters. I bought a 40 year "premium" asphalt roof. It barely made it to 20. A regular asphalt roof, perhaps 10 years. Now I have a metal roof.
> Using 30 years as a lifetime for solar panels is risky as there are no solar panels running for 30 years, not even close. Are you sure about that? https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/30-year-old-solar-panels... All the results I've seen indicate that solar panels will keep producing electricity long after those 30 years, just at a reduced rate (but seemingly still >50%).
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#364Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And your point is? Using 30 years as a lifetime for solar panels is risky as there are no solar panels running for 30 years, not even close. Never mind the lifetime of the power wall battery and the inverters. I bought a 40 year "premium" asphalt roof. It barely made it to 20. A regular asphalt roof, perhaps 10 years. Now I have a metal roof.
> Using 30 years as a lifetime for solar panels is risky as there are no solar panels running for 30 years, not even close. Are you sure about that? https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/30-year-old-solar-panels... All the results I've seen indicate that solar panels will keep producing electricity long after those 30 years, just at a reduced rate (but seemingly still >50%).
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#366Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Using 30 years as a lifetime for solar panels is risky as there are no solar panels running for 30 years, not even close. Are you sure about that? https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/30-year-old-solar-panels... All the results I've seen indicate that solar panels will keep producing electricity long after those 30 years, just at a reduced rate (but seemingly still >50%).
The article you linked to says at that age they are still producing over 80%.
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#367Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Using 30 years as a lifetime for solar panels is risky as there are no solar panels running for 30 years, not even close. Are you sure about that? https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/30-year-old-solar-panels... All the results I've seen indicate that solar panels will keep producing electricity long after those 30 years, just at a reduced rate (but seemingly still >50%).
How is generating only half the power going to work out?
> By the time the "free" electricity has paid for the installation, you'll need to replace it.
Since you won't need to replace it, I'd say that this whole thing couldn't work out better: the panels are literally just generating electricity for free! And that's not even taking into account that 30yo panels generate more than "only half the power" (the study I linked measured ~80%).
Imagine someone offered to give you their 30 year old panels and install them on your property for free. Unless every eligible surface is already taken up by more efficient solar panels, who would say no?
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#368Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm one of the biggest AI bulls on HN. I think given to the right people, it's immensely powerful and I think people in general underestimate how powerful it will get. However, AI psychosis in 2026 is definitely real. I have a non-technical high ranking (nepotism) coworker who discovered vibe coding and is now absolutely wild. He thinks he can build anything and he questions why our dev team isn't moving fast enough.…
I want to add that I think AI absolutely massively inflates the dunning kruger effect.
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI psychosis just a lazy term, much like Trump Derangement Syndrome. It sounds hostile while also removing any scope for productive discourse. Once you call someone a 'psycho', they are less likely to engage with you, and more likely to double down on their views.
> AI psychosis just a lazy term, much like Trump Derangement Syndrome. It is how languages works. The written word is not a precise art. Both those terms carry meaning, even if they abuse the term "derangement" and "psychosis"
Re: Tech CEOs are apparently suffering from AI psychosis
#370Earlier quoted context omitted.
"this system" is wild when you are talking about the universe we evolved in
which law of physics says that you pay a landlord rent or else the cops come and beat you up?