Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

twitter.com

361–367 of 367 posts

Re: Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

#361
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does, though.

Yeah. Well. I guess as a European I want the legal system to be robust in terms of protecting the citizen’s interests against corporations. I can see how you can also want robustness in terms of protecting corporate interests against citizens, so, yes, the statement remains technically true in terms of robustness. In terms of justice, again as a European, I think of Justitia, the Roman Godess, who judges based on “id…

The top-level discussed a theoretical risk of data being exfiltrated by third parties for training. Other comments discussed contract law and legal remedies, including Delaware’s excellent court system for handling business disputes.

None of this means you don’t have the same rights as an individual to enforce contract terms. I think the top commenters discussed corporate law because that is where most IP theft occurs, and corporate customers have strong contracts covering data protection.

Re: Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

#362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Denmark has a freakin' King. You guys are still a monarchy... Greenland is closer to the US than Europe, and we defended and gave back demark during WW2. Demark provides almost no financial support to Greenland, and can't defend it. It will prove to be very strategically important as the ice caps melt. Russia invaded Ukraine, and Demark lets russia use the Danish straights to transport oil despite the US asking them…

All of that aside it is not American territory and it won’t be unless it is taken by force against the will of the people that live there (and Denmark). People don’t like be threatened in particular by countries which they’re allied with.

kinda like the Thule?

Today, Greenland is recognized as an autonomous country within the Kingdom of Denmark. They are fighting for their own independence currently, and do not want to be ruled by Denmark.

Lastly, he never "threatened to take it by force". When cornered by a reporter on whether the military was off the table, he said nothing is ever off the table in a negotiation. After all that, Demark and the EU poured billions into Greenland for defense.

It took the guise of threats for the EU to finally step up on defense.

Re: Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

#364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All of that aside it is not American territory and it won’t be unless it is taken by force against the will of the people that live there (and Denmark). People don’t like be threatened in particular by countries which they’re allied with.

kinda like the Thule? Today, Greenland is recognized as an autonomous country within the Kingdom of Denmark. They are fighting for their own independence currently, and do not want to be ruled by Denmark. Lastly, he never "threatened to take it by force". When cornered by a reporter on whether the military was off the table, he said nothing is ever off the table in a negotiation. After all that, Demark and the EU pou…

"Lastly, he never "threatened to take it by force"."

You're funny.

Re: Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yes, but it's only advantage if one is compute-strained and the other isn't. if they both have lots then there's no advantage. if one doesn't fully utilise their compute then it's not an advantage either

Well, it appears all their competitors are compute starved so…

I mean. they're selling it to a competitor so it's not really an advantage

Re: Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah. Well. I guess as a European I want the legal system to be robust in terms of protecting the citizen’s interests against corporations. I can see how you can also want robustness in terms of protecting corporate interests against citizens, so, yes, the statement remains technically true in terms of robustness. In terms of justice, again as a European, I think of Justitia, the Roman Godess, who judges based on “id…

The top-level discussed a theoretical risk of data being exfiltrated by third parties for training. Other comments discussed contract law and legal remedies, including Delaware’s excellent court system for handling business disputes. None of this means you don’t have the same rights as an individual to enforce contract terms. I think the top commenters discussed corporate law because that is where most IP theft occur…

When I chuckle because of the idea that one sees the US corporate legal system as “robust”, and then give an explanation for why I (me! personally!) chuckled, what is the point of trying to argue? For what exactly?

To give yet another personal reason for my chuckle besides the ones I already gave: I don’t consider a legal system where I can simply move state when I don’t like the law not very robust. Or one that can “look back to (a mere) 200 years of case law” - especially given how that is being (re)interpreted in recent years.

That is my personal opinion. You’re entitled to your opinion, your definitions, your perspectives. I remain chuckling :) we don’t have to always agree or dig holes of rational debate, we can just find stuff funny or not. I volunteered why it is funny to me when that causes irritation with some. I read the high number of upvotes as potential agreement.

Re: Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200

#367
post #330

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's an accurate statement. The US (specifically Delaware) has a world-class corporate law system. Delaware has a court dedicated to only corporate and commercial disputes, with 200+ years of case law.

Man, good thing no one’s ever done something like reincorporate Tesla and SpaceX in Texas after loosing a court case in said Delaware court and having a pissy fit about it.

The state of incorporation doesn't often matter in interstate contracts. Usually they will include a choice of law and forum selection clause specifically to avoid this kind of thing.
Post reply on HN