Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think you’re rational. Part of being able to be unbiased is to see it in yourself. First of all. Nobody knows how LLMs work. Whether the singularity comes or not cannot be rationalized from what we know about LLMs because we simply don’t understand LLMs. This is unequivocal. I am not saying I don’t understand LLMs. I’m saying humanity doesn’t understand LLMs in much the same way we don’t understand the human…
> Nobody knows how LLMs work. I'm sorry, come again?
The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
361–370 of 800 posts
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#362If i have to read one more "It isn't this. It's this" My head will explode. That phrase is the real singularity
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#363lols and unhinged predictions aside, why are there communities excited about a singularity? Doesn't it imply the extinction of humanity?
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#364The Roman Empire took 400 years to collapse, but in San Francisco they know the singularity will occur on (next) Tuesday. The answer to the meaning of life is 42, by the way :)
However, it does fall on a 42nd day if we have 45/46 days per month!
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
if people believe its a threat and it is also real then what matters is timing
Which would also mean the accelerationists are potentially putting everyone at risk. I'd think a soft takeoff decades in the future would give us a much better chance of building the necessary safeguards and reorganizing society accordingly.
We, the people actually building it, have been discussing it for decades
I started reading Kurzweil in the early 90s
If you’re not up to speed that’s your fault
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#366Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them. ... Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind. -- Frank Herbert, Dune You won't read, except the output of your LLM. You won't write, except prompts for your LLM. Why write code or prose when the machine can write it for you? You won't think or…
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#367Phew, so we won't have to deal with the Year 2038 Unix timestamp roll over after all.
It seemed so impossibly far away. Now it's 12 years.
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#368This is delightfully unhinged, spending an amazing amount of time describing their model and citing their methodologies before getting to the meat of the meal many of us have been braying about for years: whether the singularity actually happens or not is irrelevant so much as whether enough people believe it will happen and act accordingly. And, yep! A lot of people absolutely believe it will and are acting accordin…
> whether the singularity actually happens or not is irrelevant so much as whether enough people believe it will happen and act accordingly. We've already been here in the 1980s. The tech industry needs to cultivate people who are interested in the real capabilities and the nuance around that, and eject the set of people who am to turn the tech industry into a "you don't even need a product" warmed-over acolytes of T…
It's hard to square with the computer revolution, but my take post-70s is "net creation minus creative destruction" was large but spread out over more decades. Whereas technologies like: electrification, autos, mass production, telephone, refrigeration, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, these things produced incomparable growth over a century.
So if you were born in the 70s America, your experience of taxes, inflation, prosperity and which policies work, all that can feel heavier than what folks experienced in the prior century. Of course that's in the long run (ie a generation).
I question whether AI tools have great net positive creation minus destruction.
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#369What time?
Re: The Singularity will occur on a Tuesday
#370^ That's your problem right there.
Assuming a hyperbolic model would definitely result in some exuberant predictions but that's no reason to think it's correct.
The blog post contains no justification for that model (besides well it's a "function that hits infinity"). I can model the growth of my bank account the same way but that doesn't make it so. Unfortunately.