361–370 of 372 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anthropic just reduced the price of the team plan and refunded us on the prior invoice. YMMV
So they have no durable principles for deciding who or what to refund… doesnt that make them look even worse…?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. There are other knobs they can tweak to reduce load that affect quality less than quantizing. Like trimming the conversation length without telling you, reducing reasoning effort, etc.
We never do anything that reduce model intelligence like that
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you don't do it that way then resizing the terminal corrupts what's on screen.
Counterpoint: Vim has existed for decades and does not use a bloated React rendering pipeline, and doesn't corrupt everything when it gets resized, and is much more full featured from a UI standpoint than Claude Code which is a textbox, and hits 60fps without breaking a sweat unlike Claude Code which drops frames constantly when typing small amounts of text.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So they have no durable principles for deciding who or what to refund… doesnt that make them look even worse…?
Or they do, and two sentences from two different experiences don't tell a full story?
Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or they do, and two sentences from two different experiences don't tell a full story?
Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence? Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence? Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero…
I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything.
That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not, can you expand? Asking because I’m considering Claude due to the sandbox feature.
FYI the sandbox feature is not fully baked and does not seem to be high priority. For example, for the last 3 weeks using the sandbox on Linux will almost-always litter your repo root with a bunch of write-protected trash files[0] - there are 2 PRs open to fix it, but Anthropic employees have so far entirely ignored both the issue and the PRs. Very frustrating, since models sometimes accidentally commit those files,…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything.
So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue? That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue? That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?
I object to your conclusion that "they have no durable principles": not sure how do you get to that from two different experiences documented with a single paragraph.