Live data from Hacker News

Unifi Travel Router

blog.ui.com

361–370 of 437 posts

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#361
post #277

This won’t replace my GL-AXT1800 which offers a lot more flexibility. Unifi shipping without eSIM support is a big mistake imo. I don’t want to have a 5g router(which are insanely expensive) or a second smartphone with 5G.

It doesn't have a modem. Why would it support eSIM?

It would be super convenient, given it's size, for me to purchase a eSim card abroad with unlimited data and not having to drain my phone battery.

This is a travel router.

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#362
post #338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. DNS is generally unencrypted and leaking that over whatever open wifi you're on is generally worse from a privacy perspective than the latency you add bouncing through your home where you probably have encrypted DNS setup. Even if you don't visit any http sites, you never know what might phone home over http, so an OS level VPN provides foolproof privacy at the cost of a tiny bit of latency.

Using encrypted DNS doesn't necessitate routing all your traffic through your home network. You can still encrypt all your traffic by using an encrypted DNS service or, if you really want to, a VPN service. But moving everything through your home network is not necessary, especially if you have any kind of usage caps.

DNS is just one example. Like I said on my post you never know what data might be sent home in plaintext

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#363
post #288

When I travel, I like carrying as little as possible. These comments are fascinating to me, people are brining more devices than I have in my whole house and needing to make a LAN for them. Personally I just connect my phone to WiFi and then use Tailscale and call it a day.

I'm not sure there's a dichotomy. I travel for a week at a time across the country, and bring only a backpack that fits under the seat on the airplane. But there's a GL.iNet router in that bag, since it gives all my devices Mullvad + Tailscale. Good use of space in my opinion, since I can access all the services I host from my home 3000 miles away with zero extra config.

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#364

I never travel without my GL-AXT1800. Saved me so many times: https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-axt1800/ I’m actually on it right now.

Is there a 5g dongle I can connect to it? I’ve been searching to no avail

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same! And the best thing is that you can install Tailscale, so you can connect to your tailnet, and exit all traffic through one of your nodes (e.g., your home/office network). It's incredibly useful, with the added bonus that you don't need to install tailscale client in any of your travel devices (phone, tablet, work computer, etc).

I’m seeing a lot of this same comment here, so I went to check out this tailscale thing, which clearly I must need. Can anybody explain what Tailscale is, does, or why everybody seems to have it? Looking at their website, it’s just a huge wall of business jargon. Really! Read it. It’s nothing but a list of enterprise terminology. There’s a “how it works “ page full of more (different) jargon, acronyms and buzzwords,…

For me: it's a way to access services I host on my homelab LAN from 3000 miles away. Having a router that automatically logs into that and routes TS addresses properly allows you to use all your devices connected to that router to access TS services with no further configuration. I host Kiwix, Copyparty, Llama.cpp, FreshRSS, and a bunch of other services on my homelab, and being able to access all of those remotely is convenient.

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#366
post #16
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a hard time believing anyone would actually use this versus self-hosting headscale in a discarded ThinkCentre and running it from a closet.

Not sure if you’re serious but reeks of “you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially”

But Unifi should be able to implement this with zero extra hardware, just with VPN-style clients on phones and laptops?

I'm just surprised this needs an extra device. It would make sense if the device provided its own connectivity (with global wireless service, say), but this doesn't seem to be the case here. It still needs an uplink.

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#367
post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people spend 100+ days a year in hotels.

I did 82 days last year. Everyone travels different, but for me I feel like any time I spend watching TV in the hotel is wasted time - I'm in a whole other city, surely there's something I can do? The hotel is just somewhere to take a shower and sleep. I don't watch much TV in general though so I guess it's easier for me.

It really depends. I have a friend who works in hospitality. She travels to some of the nicest hotels in world-class cities. Most of my friends who travel for work are staying in a chain hotel near an office park 25 miles outside the core city they are ostensibly traveling to.

Completely different experiences when it comes to experiencing/exploring the city.

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not really "basically wireguard" and you don't have to pay for it for personal use. Wireguard is indeed pretty easy to set up, but basic Wireguard doesn't get you the two most significant features of Tailscale, mesh connections and access controls. Tailscale does use Wireguard, but it establishes connections between each of your devices, in many cases these will be direct connections even if the devices in quest…

I guess I'm still not following. Is there an example thing that you can do with Tailscale that you can't do with Wireguard? "Establishes connections between each of your devices" is pretty vague. The Internet can already do that.

[deleted]

Re: Unifi Travel Router

#370
post #357
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a cryptographic key exchange system that allows nodes to open Wireguard tunnels between each other. They have a nice product, but I don't like how it spies on your “private” network by default: https://tailscale.com/kb/1011/log-mesh-traffic If you want to self-host, use NetBird instead.

Where spies == logging and they tell you, and provide clear opt out instructions

Imagine thinking most people read Knowledge Base articles and don't just take the defaults.

They even manage to squeeze some FUD into the opt-out toggle's name.

Post reply on HN