Earlier quoted context omitted.
this doesnt work if they use a 3rd party email filtering service like mimecast or proofpoint fyi.
Another red flag! :)
Proofpoint, definitely a very big red flag.
Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
361–370 of 404 posts
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#362One of the first things I do after getting an inquiry from a recruiter or friend referral is lookup the MX record for the company’s email domain. It is an anonymous one-command check to see if they’re a Microsoft shop. If they are, it’s enormous personal red flag. MSFT is very popular so I’m only speaking about my own experience, but I have learned over the course of 20 years that an MSFT IT stack is highly correlate…
I'm gonna be honest, you sound like a problem employee. The companies not using Microsoft, are using Google. Which in my experience is equally or measurably worse. Just personal data points, but every avowed Microsoft hater I've ever worked with has been... difficult. Like a-drag-on-the-team-because-he-refuses-to-use-company-tools difficult. Edit: How does an aged post on this site go from +4 to -1 in the span of a f…
I disagree. He sounds like an excellent, intelligent, potentially attractive employee.
People who signal that MS is sh*t are always worthwhile to listen to. They have character and principles, and they know bad and good software when they see it.
Needless to say, in my company all microsoft products are banned and I would never hire microsoft fanboys.
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#363Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
I once rejected a job because of Teams; I felt bad/entitled about it though... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30264591
I’m fairly certain I’d deeply regret my life choices if I had to use teams daily. Occasional (mandatory) usage interacting with it for various gov’t usage, etc. has reinforced that view. Why subject yourself to something you know you’ll hate every day if you can avoid it? Is that being entitled? Plenty of people don’t have such choices, sure! If so, who cares? Live your life, make your decisions. Don’t let jealous pe…
If everyone else genuinely loved Teams, I could stomach using it even though I hate it. But regardless of what anyone says about it, it seems the rest of the company also hates it— it's a ghost town. There's no sense of community whatsoever.
My personal "sample size" is too small to be sure, but I worry that Teams usage is poisonous to collaboration and engineering culture.
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#365Sharepoint is one of the worst, most bug-ridden softwares I've worked with. It has a bug with Solidworks (3D design suite) that sporadically makes files completely un-openable unless you go in and change some metadata. They are aware of this, doesn't seem to be any limitation preventing them from fixing it, and it has sat unfixed for years. Microsoft's cloud storage as a whole is an insane tangle where you never know…
They've managed to mess up sharepoint even worse lately. I went there to try to find where company meetings got recorded to. I went to my sharepoint bookmark, which weirdly is www.office.com after some previous nightmare rebrand. Except what used to be the way into your sharepoint files, is now just a full page copilot screen with no hint of where the fuck your files are. Even though you've been visiting this bookmar…
MS has adopted the Winchester Mystery House model for architecture in Sharepoint.
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#366One of the first things I do after getting an inquiry from a recruiter or friend referral is lookup the MX record for the company’s email domain. It is an anonymous one-command check to see if they’re a Microsoft shop. If they are, it’s enormous personal red flag. MSFT is very popular so I’m only speaking about my own experience, but I have learned over the course of 20 years that an MSFT IT stack is highly correlate…
I'm gonna be honest, you sound like a problem employee. The companies not using Microsoft, are using Google. Which in my experience is equally or measurably worse. Just personal data points, but every avowed Microsoft hater I've ever worked with has been... difficult. Like a-drag-on-the-team-because-he-refuses-to-use-company-tools difficult. Edit: How does an aged post on this site go from +4 to -1 in the span of a f…
^^Microsoft may have its warts, but I don't know how someone can go from Excel to Google Sheets or Outlook to Gmail and think: this is just such a major upgrade I don't know how I existed in the past and I would never work someplace that uses Microsoft productivity tools.
Excel in particular, for any power user, sheets just doesn't hold a candle to its functionality. Outside of the valley Microsoft must still have a 10:1 ratio of corporate use, I never run across a customer that has made the switch.
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#367Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but the question is why do all the companies buy into their full ecosystem, Old manager I had one told me: "I wish Microsoft made all the software in the world because it works so well together!" He was the guy who bought our company a one-way ticket to O365. He was also woefully tech ignorant and could barley drive software outside of office programs.
Yup, proves the old adage that you never let the tech fluent make tooling decisions for normal people. Nothing would kill a large orgs momentum faster than half their employees stuck reading man pages for trivial tasks. Microsoft is a good black and white, you can do this or you can't. Which works better organizationally than the "I bet I could hack this together in a few weeks" and have everyone wait around so one "…
You are ignoring the fact that people are mostly complaining about Microsoft saying their software will do something, and then it not really working or falling apart (like with security incidents).
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#368One of the first things I do after getting an inquiry from a recruiter or friend referral is lookup the MX record for the company’s email domain. It is an anonymous one-command check to see if they’re a Microsoft shop. If they are, it’s enormous personal red flag. MSFT is very popular so I’m only speaking about my own experience, but I have learned over the course of 20 years that an MSFT IT stack is highly correlate…
I'm gonna be honest, you sound like a problem employee. The companies not using Microsoft, are using Google. Which in my experience is equally or measurably worse. Just personal data points, but every avowed Microsoft hater I've ever worked with has been... difficult. Like a-drag-on-the-team-because-he-refuses-to-use-company-tools difficult. Edit: How does an aged post on this site go from +4 to -1 in the span of a f…
I am not a Microsoft hater; in fact, I have been using Microsoft products since MS-DOS 3.3. But Outlook and its ecosystem are a horrible shit show and an indicator of terrible decision-making.
Google Workspace is an infinitely better productivity framework; there's no space for discussion here.
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
SharePoint really is that bad though (and I say this as someone who used to develop for it as a platform). The fact that it's so widespread in our corporate culture is more indicative of how enshittified it is. Now, realistically, we might not be able to avoid it because of that, but let's not pretend that it's not shit.
It fills a niche. What’s else does? Yes, it’s not great, but so what?
Lotus/IBM/HCL Domino.
Re: Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via SharePoint flaws
#370Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm gonna be honest, you sound like a problem employee. The companies not using Microsoft, are using Google. Which in my experience is equally or measurably worse. Just personal data points, but every avowed Microsoft hater I've ever worked with has been... difficult. Like a-drag-on-the-team-because-he-refuses-to-use-company-tools difficult. Edit: How does an aged post on this site go from +4 to -1 in the span of a f…
My current gig is an MSFT shop and when I joined I was genuinely excited to find out just how far that universe had come in the 20+ years since I last worked in a corp environment that uses it. The Ballmer days are long behind and there's been some genuinely cool stuff coming out of MS since. I don't think I was ready for how bad it is. Not going to go into an inventory of it all, but I'll admit I genuinely lost it w…
>I don't think I was ready for how bad it is.
Says it's unthinkably bad then proceeds to give only one example. There are several other issues you can list.
>the terminal -- the terminal! -- freezes after staying open several days, and you need to kill it and restart it.
I wonder when that issue ever happened since I'm always ssh'd into my homelab via the terminal for days and never had to restart it since it never froze.
>The worst part, I think, is how the brokenness ends up permeating the engineering culture. Malfunction is just normalized.
Microsoft didn't make the culture like that, the managers were always like that which made them choose Microsoft because they just choose the biggest corporate name brand supplier. It's your typical old-school MBA.
I've worked at all-MS shops and at all-Linux shops, and despite the issues with MS tech, the all-MS shops were far less toxic and pleasant to work at as people treated it as a 9-5 job instead of their own personal start-up project that needs to strictly conform to their world view, therefore the linux-shops I worked at tended to attract more of the toxic problem employees like your grandparent whos work life revolved around tech evangelism than pragmatism, which I didn't like since I just wanted to get work done and go home, not participate in some crusade at work to judge and shame choices of OS/IDE/languages/frameworks/tools the company should be using. As long as I get paid, I'll use any widely available tool, I don't really care.