Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX's giant Starship Mars rocket nails critical 10th test flight

space.com

361–363 of 363 posts

Re: SpaceX's giant Starship Mars rocket nails critical 10th test flight

#361
post #271

Starship is like AI/LLMs in that success would revolutionize the world, but technological failure is very possible. And despite the confident predictions on the internets, we don't know which it's going to be. After the Shuttle program ended in failure, work on reusable launch systems stopped for decades. A similar thing would happen if Starship fails. Space would remain the province of the military and large governm…

The thing is, there is no demand to get that much stuff into space. Falcon 9 has massively brought down the cost per orbit, and even with the whole world as a captive market, every university in every country putting up cubesats, they still don't have nearly enough payloads to make the economies of scale kick in. Hence Starlink. The majority of SpaceX payload mass has been Starlink, something nobody was even asking f…

Starlink, at scale would be able to replace the telecoms and broadband internet providers with a superior product globally. So that total addressable market is in the trillions.

Re: SpaceX's giant Starship Mars rocket nails critical 10th test flight

#362
post #170

Starship is like AI/LLMs in that success would revolutionize the world, but technological failure is very possible. And despite the confident predictions on the internets, we don't know which it's going to be. After the Shuttle program ended in failure, work on reusable launch systems stopped for decades. A similar thing would happen if Starship fails. Space would remain the province of the military and large governm…

Assuming it doesn't trigger Kessler Syndrome.

Starlink satellites are so low in altitude that Kessler syndrome could not occur because their orbits would decay within weeks and reenter the atmosphere and burn up.

Re: SpaceX's giant Starship Mars rocket nails critical 10th test flight

#363

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They've already demonstrated they can orbit, they just choose not to. Reaching orbit and orbiting the planet are two different things. Saying that that is not reaching orbit is like saying McDonalds is failing at serving breakfast all day because they chose not to serve breakfast after 11:00 to meet their goals.

>Reaching orbit and orbiting the planet are two different things. LOL. Are you serious? To reach orbit: to reach a horizontal speed such that the spacecraft can complete a revolution around the celestial object while in free fall, without having to execute any additional maneuvers. Starship has yet to reach orbit. The reason doesn't matter. It hasn't done it.

In your world, you can't run even though you get up to running speed but you chose to walk. You sound so dumb.
Post reply on HN