Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

finance.yahoo.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

361–370 of 845 posts

Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

#361

Post by mystified5016 »

samstave wrote: post #341
api wrote: post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OpenAI lobbied for restrictive rules, and now they want an "out" but only for themselves. Absolute naked regulatory capture.

[flagged]

No amount of exposure so far has had any effect on corruption. That AI will somehow improve this is just magical thinking.

Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

#364

Post by cadamsdotcom »

samstave wrote: post #349
dchichkov wrote: post #8

>> In the proposal, OpenAI also said the U.S. needs “a copyright strategy that promotes the freedom to learn” and on “preserving American AI models’ ability to learn from copyrighted material.” Perhaps also symmetric "freedom to learn" from OpenAI models, with some provisions / naming convention? U.S. labs are limited in this way, while labs in China are not.

[flagged]

Can you expand your post and explain why?

Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

#365

Post by Dylan16807 »

a_wild_dandan wrote: post #261
mirekrusin wrote: post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you compress the internet including copyrighted material and then sell access to it? At what percentage of lossy compression it becomes infringement?

When you identify where the infringing party has stored the source material in their artifact.{zip,pdf,safetensor,connectome,etc}. In ML, this discovery stage is called "mechanistic interpretability", and in humans it's called "illegal."

It's not that clear cut. Since they're talking about taking lossy compression to the limit, there are ways to go so lossy that you're not longer infringing even if you can point exactly at where it's stored.

Like cliff's notes.

Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

#366

Post by bamboozled »

basisword wrote: post #273

“Please help us. We’re only a little business worth $157 billion!” - The company ripping off everyone that’s ever written or drawn anything. Company’s like AirBnB and Uber breaking the rules, gaining control of the market, and then pushing up prices was bad. “Open” AI is just a whole other level of hubris.

They will probably get it too :)

Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

#368

Post by samstave »

mystified5016 wrote: post #361
samstave wrote: post #341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

No amount of exposure so far has had any effect on corruption. That AI will somehow improve this is just magical thinking.

No - I mean the accessibility to the information and blatant use of power whereby we always knew it existed, but now we can tabulate and analyze it.

Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules

#369

Post by yonran »

msp26 wrote: post #45

Relevant (I don't know why the article doesn't link to them directly): https://openai.com/global-affairs/openai-proposals-for-the-u... https://cdn.openai.com/global-affairs/ostp-rfi/ec680b75-d539...

Thank you. I am disappointed that almost none of the comments here discuss the OpenAI proposals on the merits. I do hope that the federal government heeds most of these ideas, particularly recognizing that training a model should be fair use.
Post reply on HN