Guess Australia will get a lot of kids well-versed in VPN use.
According to recent studies kids don't know what a file or a folder is and can't even copy/paste anymore, I think we have a good margin.
Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
361–370 of 498 posts
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#362Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#363Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or marijuana or cocaine. It’s super easy for the government to deny access to things people want by fiat, as evidenced by the fact that nobody does cocaine anymore.
Sadly I can confirm that people still do cocaine
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
See this is just thing the commenter you are replying to is saying. Just read the comments in your second link tearing apart the study. Given the replication crisis in psychology, the authors make bad choices in the experiment design that are not justifiable in 2022.
How about my third link?
I will say that the lengths the executive goes to to compare social media with tobacco degrade the quality of the argument in my opinion; science tends to ask the question and then seek the answer. Arguments like this seem to start with the answer (it's like Big Tobacco) and then construct the argument accordingly.
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any and all kids in rural areas. Experience deprivation is a very real thing. I grew up in a desolate rural area, circa the 1980s and 1990s. The Internet - WebChatBroadcasting, ICQ, IRC, etc - was like a gift from the gods in the early 1990s. Cutting off young teens from access to the world via 'social media,' is a human rights violation.
The idea that social media is like a Meta commercial, all making new friends and video calls to smiling Grandparents, etc. is a fabrication, presumably one that a lot of HN folks have a vested interest in maintaining. Kids are lonelier now than they have ever been.
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#366This is going to be an interesting experiment to watch. Because if I know kids, they will find any creative way they can to circumvent the ban. And even worse is if some actor out there starts catering to kids by publishing "proxy services". My opinion on this is that it's the same as banning drugs. People want to use them, and will find any way to use them.
How long until this happens and there's a big paedophilia scare so I can point and laugh at everyone involved?
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#367Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#368Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty sure you're being downvoted for implying that 99.9% of adults are "MAPs".
My guess is that BSDobelix was downvoted and flagged for implying that people supportive of LGBTQ rights are (in comparison to the rest of the population) significantly more likely to be pedophiles.
Re: Australia: Kids under 16 to be banned from social media after Senate passes laws
#370This is going to be an interesting experiment to watch. Because if I know kids, they will find any creative way they can to circumvent the ban. And even worse is if some actor out there starts catering to kids by publishing "proxy services". My opinion on this is that it's the same as banning drugs. People want to use them, and will find any way to use them.