Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
361–370 of 1001 posts
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#362Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Because in reality, as in statistically, SF is actually not that dangerous. People say this about any vaguely blue city, which is almost all of them. But they forget Urban areas are very dense. You're actually more likely, per capita, to die to gun violence in rural America. It's just very hard to see that because the coverage isn't there and the actual amount of deaths is lower.
Most non-suicide gun violence is gang related and you're going to have a tough time convincing anyone there's more gang activity in rural Nebraska than there is in inner city Chicago.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#363Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
The 17th largest city in the US is mid-sized?
From my perspective living in Asia I’d place it on par with a small rural village
Non-major cities do, but not “small rural villages”.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
That was already the case before Musk bought it.
What? No it wasn't! You used to be able to view entire Twitter threads without being logged in. It was also possible to go to someone's account page and see their posts in reverse chronological order. The latter went away shortly after Musk took over. The former took a little longer, but is now gone as well. In many cases you can't even view a single tweet without the site trying to get you to log in.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#366Why is the title of the HN post changed to read "Twitter", when the linked article title states correctly "X", and is otherwise identical?
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#367Twitter was given a famously sweet deal by the city to occupy that troubled stretch of Market St. In the time I lived nearby (until the pandemic) the area never really improved. San Francisco has an odd tolerance for the tent communities, no just that it largely allows them, but that it allows them in and around the busiest and most publicly-utilized transit hubs and the city center.
What do you think the city should do with the tent communities?
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#368As a UK chap, can someone give me their opinion on if San Jose is a more pleasant place to live than San Fran these days?
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#369Realistically, X is better than its ever been; community notes have been a game-changer in terms of fact-checking. Higher quality and much more balanced.
Re: Twitter kills its San Francisco headquarters, will relocate to South Bay
#370Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you think it would collapse when he canned the 80%
Revenue is down by a larger percentage than the headcount, right? I think that counts as "collapse" by any reasonable definition.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1820849880283107725?s=46&t=alZ...