Live data from Hacker News

The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

drericlevi.substack.com

361–370 of 521 posts

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it comes down to, if you read the history of the American Medical Association, that some doctors simply didn’t like a free market pushing down prices for their services.

then again, who does

In this case, people who rely on health services to live probably do.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the U.S., sure. But in the UK status of a doctor is akin to that of a schoolteacher. Totally not a highly sought-after, profitable career like it is in the U.S.

Doctors are paid a lot more than schoolteachers in the UK and in my experience are respected because of their profession. I think you're totally incorrect.

Seconded. My perception is that here in Britain, medical doctors are highly respected, and pretty well paid. This is different from the US, where medical doctors are highly respected and extremely well paid.

Prestige is, of course, not a function of income alone. Plenty of software developers get paid at least as much as respected professors or top military brass. That doesn't mean they have equivalent prestige.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#363
This is what happens when the people doing the actual good work are looked at purely as a cost. The administration that is brought about to contain that cost will end up costing way more than any possible cost savings they could theoretically get. Putting the force of government behind that administration just makes it that much worse.

I see the same thing in tech. Engineers used to be empowered and productively making things that empowered everyone, and now they're disempowered, broken to the saddle of whatever the tech oligarchs are fancying today.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#364

One of my friends I grew up with was “that kid;” smartest in the community, funny, played a mean guitar. Everyone loved him. Top of class. Harvard. Harvard med. Top placement for residency. Something happened during that time and he killed himself. It was absolutely unexpected from all of his friends. Shocking to say the least. Apparently it turned out to be stress from work, his hours, his fear of failing. Who will…

It's not the pressure or hard work that breaks us, it's the frustration from not being able to control anything. It's the knowledge of knowing that if you had some amount of say in what was going on, things could improve for everyone. And knowing that people who are not impacted by this in the least have all of the power. So you can either quit what you love, or keep doing what you love in a psychologically unsafe, unhealthy, and toxic system.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#365
post #283

I am a working physician (50+) that is currently in training to become an IT professional, preferably working with development of new patient records systems. Being a physician is just not very intellectually challenging, more emotionally challenging, programming is in my mind a real challenge. Any others with experience of changing fields?

> preferably working with development of new patient records systems. That field is quite a mess. There's a oligopoly of few large vendors with low quality products but high quality politics and sales. Although as a working physicians you're probably familiar at least with the results. Edit: Further discussion, including EHR system developers, here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39186252 Having been on the use…

EHR is truly a mess which is why I feel compelled, as a somewhat computer-skilled physician, to try to do something. There is a lot of potential to improve EHR but I think we have to start from scratch with a completely new way of thinking. It will be very costly but current solutions aren't working to help the physician, it just adds to the workload.

The business models of EHR's I'm not that familiar with, I will read the thread you provided, thanks! It sounds like you have experience working with EHR development?

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don’t be obtuse. You’re comparing garden gnomes with healthcare.

I mentioned garden gnomes as an example of how supply side economics and “scarcity drives demand” doesn’t work.

The post you replied to scoped their statement to „coveted“ applications. No one actually believes scarcity drives demand in all cases.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure that's a good enough explanation. There's minimal if any impact from a given doctor on country wide policies, especially the ones funded by state. Junior doctors in the UK couldn't push basic improvements to both their working conditions and pay. That doesn't seem to match the idea that they can meaningfully influence the doctors intake numbers.

I don’t know about other countries but that’s absolutely the case for the US. The culprit is the AMA. > In the 20th century, the AMA has frequently lobbied to restrict the supply of physicians, contributing to a doctor shortage in the United States.[10][11][12] The organization has also lobbied against allowing physician assistants and other health care providers to perform basic forms of health care. The organizatio…

Obviously, they are a big problem, but they're not the only problem. It is received wisdom among doctors that increasing the number of doctors causes medical costs to go up, and it is generally also the position of the state.

The doctors are simply wrong; the state is correct from a pernicious point of view.

Because the state is responsible for buying so much of the total supply of medical care, they generally view things from the perspective of "how much are we spending on the category 'medical care'?", rather than the perspective of how much any given treatment costs.

Increasing the number of doctors lowers the cost of all treatments and is unambiguously good.

However, it does raise the total amount of medical spending, which, in the eyes of the state, is bad.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#368
> I went into medicine knowing that I will have to sacrifice much for the sake of my patients. What I am realising is that today in modern medicine, a doctor is just one of the many commodities in this complex industry. It’s no longer about the patient. It’s about the business of hospitals. Patient satisfaction officers, Theatre Utilisation officers, Patient Flow Coordinators. These are all business roles.

I have to yet to meet one person who says American Healthcare is wonderful, fairly priced and efficient.

It seems private Equity and mergers are slowly juicing out the system - the doctors, patients, nurses.

Its a sad state of world that we don’t allow pilots to overwork because our lives depend on it, but we allow doctors to overwork and don’t count patients dying due to them being overworked.

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it comes down to, if you read the history of the American Medical Association, that some doctors simply didn’t like a free market pushing down prices for their services.

Yeah, but why is the same situation present, and the same explanation given, in Poland, EU? Or, seeing from other comments, plenty other countries around the world? I'm seconding 'viraptor here - this isn't a good enough explanation. It doesn't stand up to scrutiny, and doesn't mesh well with day-to-day experience. Individual doctors I know seem to have very little influence over anything, and they're first in line t…

There are a few factors:

1. Doctors have a lot of political influence because they are popular. This means they can get away with things that other industries mostly can't.

2. State provision of medical care corrupts the system, as I describe sidethread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40030452

One way to drive "medical costs" down is to ensure that the supply of medical care is low. This also drives prices up. This means that the incentives of the regulatory body are directly contrary to the incentives of the people supposedly benefiting from the regulation.

(And doctors and hospitals are happy with this, because such a system boils down to telling them "we want you to do less work, but for more money".)

3. (Tangentially, note that the general model of "restrict supply, subsidize demand" is incredibly common. It's popular both ways; the first part helps a small but politically active and highly motivated group, and the second part pretends to help the populace in general.)

Re: The darker side of being a doctor (2017)

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not always. If I sell garden gnomes wearing knitted hats, but I only make three a year and sell to only people who drive yellow cars, I doubt I could earn a decent living off this

Don’t be obtuse. You’re comparing garden gnomes with healthcare.

Don't be a pain. All analogies are wrong, but they can still be illustrative
Post reply on HN