Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assuming you're talking about the overall sharp drop-off and not the bounce-backs, this was my favorite way to explain it to students: We live near the ocean, and we have a rocky shoreline. We have a couple coves nearby. One cove is about the a half-mile across, but the opening to the larger bay nearby is just a couple hundred feet. On most days, the cove is really calm and the bay has roughly two foot waves. So, you…
That makes sense as far as explaining another situation where you would see a similar pattern, but it doesn't really explain why. What's the equivalent of the land surrounding the cove here? The sun's gravity well? But that's a gradual drop-off, are we looking at the distance where the gravitational pull on particles is canceled out by some other force?
Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
361–370 of 649 posts
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#362Earlier quoted context omitted.
If something like Voyager would arrive from outside our Solar system it would be the event of the millenium.
There's every possibility that neither Voyager will ever arrive anywhere ever again. If they do, it's going to be after our galaxy collides with another, and the place they arrive at may not even exist yet. https://www.space.com/predicting-voyager-golden-records-dist...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda%E2%80%93Milky_Way_...
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#363One of my favorite tech legends is that apparently Voyager 1 launched with a Viterbi encoder, even though there was no computer on Earth at the time fast enough to decode it. After a number of years Moore's Law caught up and they remotely switched over to Viterbi for more efficient transmissions.
The notion that encoding/transmitting could be simpler than decoding/receiving is interesting. It reminds me of the way optical drives for many years could write at, say, 48x but read at 8x, such that the majority of time spent was the verification step (if enabled) rather than the burn step. Just speculating, I assume it's because of things like error correction, filtering out noise/degradation. Producing the extra…
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could've said the same for air travel in the early days.
Well, we don’t have great figures on this but there are some estimates that only 20% of the human population has ever flown on an airplane. That seems like it’s a pretty heavily “gilded only” type of thing especially if you look at percentage distributions of flight frequency and by class.
Only about 60% of the world’s population has reliable access to clean drinking water. 18% of people own a car.
Compared to those numbers, 20% of people flying seems downright common - especially considering many people likely never fly simply because they have nowhere worth going (relative to cost).
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#365Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#366Is there any chance we can zap its general direction with a radio beam and then listen with a huge radio telescope to get an accurate radar fix on where it is?
No. It's simply too far away for that, because d*4 gets you. Now, if the zapper were Big Enough, when received it didn't destroy the probe, AND that there was a big enough receiver, they maybe...
At 22.5 light minutes, that works out to about half a meter (!) if my trig is correct.
We’d probably have to absolutely blast it with energy though.
[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_resolution#:~:text=T....]
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#367Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tend to generally ignore Russia in the context of development nowadays in spaceflight because I don't see them having the spare resources or talent to do any meaningful new development. They're good at reusing and iterating what they inherited from the USSR, but they've promised so much new stuff over the years and have delivered on basically nothing. The countries I mentioned have all at least managed to bring onl…
China?
I don't like them politically, but they are clearly a very capable spacefaring nation, with the capability to develop new space-related technologies.
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#368Ok so it says online it’s going at almost 40,000 mph so what is stopping us from sending one at say 400,000 mph, then couldn’t we catch up with it eventually? and travel the same distance in like 5 years?
and do what? at that speed, all you'll be able to do is wave as it sails by. you're not stopping at anything at that speed. however, even at 400k mph, that will not reach the next anything of interest before humans are extinct. here's some logic on why even getting to the closest star isn't likely: https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/33274/how-long-cou...
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#369One of my favorite facts ever is that Voyager 1 contains something called the Voyager Golden Record [1]. It has the following quote written: This is a present from a small, distant world, a token of our sounds, our science, our images, our music, our thoughts and our feelings. We are attempting to survive our time so we may live into yours. I get chills everytime I think about this. I hope we can recover from this ev…
At least I learned it in my childhood (together with Pioneer plaque -- I just noticed they're not the same thing!)
Re: Voyager 1 stops communicating with Earth
#370I always have a sense of pride and a feeling of respect for us as a human race when reading about V'ger. It's astonishing that we were able to send a space probe, designed and built to be so robust that it's still doing its thing and sending us postcards after 46 years(!!!) of flying away from us in an extremely harmful environment, while we still fuck simple stuff up back home.
I appreciate the Star Trek reference (V'ger incase somebody doesn't know what I'm talking about - Star Trek, The Motion Picture). That movie awed me as a kid.