Live data from Hacker News

FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

wsj.com

361–370 of 746 posts

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#361

Where does did all that money go? Is it part of a zero sum game and in someone else's hands now, did it evaporate, or a combination of the two?

Literally ~$50 million went straight to the Democratic Party as direct campaign donations.

He stated he intended to give up to $1 billion to democrats.

Millions more went to various other people in power who will now decide the fate of SBF.

Sources:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/14/sam-bankman-fried-backtracks...

His Wikipedia page.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#362
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>ponzi scheme This is not a ponzi scheme. This is a good old "not firewalling your customer's money and your investment money" that everyone suffered from in 2008. The situation is cataphoric enough without people mis-using terms.

>The first $10,000 USD value in your deposit wallets will earn 8% APY (This is what FTX was offering customers) And now we know the accounts weren't actually covered by real money (or "value" as they called it). So when person X was asking FTX for their money back, FTX would send person X+1's money to cover Sounds like a Ponzi to me

I find it very ironic that Satoshi created Bitcoin with the objective to be more resilient than banks, with the famous genesis block containing "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks". A decade later, the bitcoin creation generated an entire industry of "crypto banks" that are opaque, played with customers money and went bankrupt.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#363
post #288

From the article: "FTX Chief Executive Sam Bankman-Fried said in investor meetings this week that Alameda owes FTX about $10 billion, people familiar with the matter said. FTX extended loans to Alameda using money that customers had deposited on the exchange for trading purposes, a decision that Mr. Bankman-Fried described as a poor judgment call, one of the people said." In the FTX International terms of service ( h…

How many years could Sam Bankman-Fried get in jail? It is also interesting to read on his Wikipedia profile [1] about "Bankman-Fried is a supporter of effective altruism and claims to pursue earning to give as an altruistic career. He is a member of Giving What We Can and has claimed that he plans to donate the great majority of his wealth to effective charities over the course of his life.". Having direct access to…

Using client funds to go double or nothing is ethical in utilianism.

When the ends justify the means, anything goes.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> JP Morgan says expect 50% drop across the board in crypto. Around 10 AM PST, somebody just pulled a billion dollars out of Tether. Meanwhile, aggregate of the cryptocurrency market is up 5.38% over the last day, Tether recovered landing on 0.9999 USD after 4-5 hours of the drop hitting bottom at 0.9818 USD, which was nowhere near previous all-time low Tether has hit previously. In other words, everyone screams "pan…

FTX let people withdraw 100% of the time until they didn’t.

Which is pretty good uptime if you ask me…

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is absolutely a blockchain failure. Blockchains are intentionally designed to facilitate this. They have no possible way to stop this kind of fraud. Even if you built an elaborate set of smart contracts that could audit participants, they would still not stop anything. That activity can just be moved to another chain and avoid the audits. This kind of thing can just keep happening over and over again, as it alread…

This is not true at all. If you are the only person in the world with the private key to your coins, you are the only person who can move them. Period. FTX is a centralized entity that custodies funds. It has nothing to do with a blockchain, which could have completely prevented this. There are many examples of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) for which it is mathematically impossible to loan out depositor's funds with…

> If you are the only person in the world with the private key to your coins, you are the only person who can move them. Period.

Right up to the moment you lose your laptop in a fire, forget the password to your wallet, accidentally run malware on your personal computer, etc. Or if you die and haven't gone through the complication of setting up a way for your heirs to gain control of your accounts.

Yes, you can take steps to mitigate these risks. Those steps are absolutely insane from the POV of everyday human beings.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#366
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How many years could Sam Bankman-Fried get in jail? It is also interesting to read on his Wikipedia profile [1] about "Bankman-Fried is a supporter of effective altruism and claims to pursue earning to give as an altruistic career. He is a member of Giving What We Can and has claimed that he plans to donate the great majority of his wealth to effective charities over the course of his life.". Having direct access to…

Or people that are unethical use charities as a front to do illegal things without remorse

Anyone talking about how ethical they are and will be with their money is immediately moved to the top of the “sus” list.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m pretty ignorant when it comes to this space. Do they not have any kind of compliance structure? In hindsight it seems pretty obvious that this sort of thing would happen without it.

Well, they at least had compliance staff. "Most of FTX's legal and compliance staff quit Tuesday evening, people familiar with the matter told Semafor, leaving few executives who could answer questions that now loom large over the firm." https://www.semafor.com/article/11/09/2022/ftx-legal-and-com... Pretty much every large exchange has a compliance team, btw, at least the ones with US operations.

I mean, would you stay around to answer those sticky questions? They demonstrably failed at their only job.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#368
post #312

From the article: "FTX Chief Executive Sam Bankman-Fried said in investor meetings this week that Alameda owes FTX about $10 billion, people familiar with the matter said. FTX extended loans to Alameda using money that customers had deposited on the exchange for trading purposes, a decision that Mr. Bankman-Fried described as a poor judgment call, one of the people said." In the FTX International terms of service ( h…

> banks at least tell you they are loaning your deposits out Side not but that’s not really how banking works. Banks create deposits when they originate loans and separately look for the assets they need in order to satisfy any regulatory requirements and net flows of funds for inter bank settlements. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/m...

The details of how the actual transactions occur might be different, but the general concept of fractional reserve banking is still “loaning out a portion of deposits”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#369
post #362
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The first $10,000 USD value in your deposit wallets will earn 8% APY (This is what FTX was offering customers) And now we know the accounts weren't actually covered by real money (or "value" as they called it). So when person X was asking FTX for their money back, FTX would send person X+1's money to cover Sounds like a Ponzi to me

I find it very ironic that Satoshi created Bitcoin with the objective to be more resilient than banks, with the famous genesis block containing "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks". A decade later, the bitcoin creation generated an entire industry of "crypto banks" that are opaque, played with customers money and went bankrupt.

Indeed, ironic. But this also laid the path for DeFi, which processes similar volumes per day as centralized exchanges, without the single counterparty risk.

Re: FTX tapped into customer accounts to fund risky bets, setting up its downfall

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> JP Morgan says expect 50% drop across the board in crypto. Around 10 AM PST, somebody just pulled a billion dollars out of Tether. Meanwhile, aggregate of the cryptocurrency market is up 5.38% over the last day, Tether recovered landing on 0.9999 USD after 4-5 hours of the drop hitting bottom at 0.9818 USD, which was nowhere near previous all-time low Tether has hit previously. In other words, everyone screams "pan…

Tether will stay very close to 1.0 until, some day, they can't make a redemption. The number to watch is their "market cap". Note that Tether can make that go up by minting more Tether, but when you see it go down, that usually means someone cashed out. Stablecoins have only two stable points: 1 and 0.

You'd think Tether would be printing money arbing their coin, at this rate.
Post reply on HN