As I and others have previously pointed out [1] foone uses they/them pronouns and feels particularly frustrated when their posts get featured on HN, because users here seem unable to honor this simple preference of theirs. It looks like they deleted their tweet out of frustration with todays latest round of misgendering. I hope people on HN will learn to respect all members of our community. Yes that involves not ass…
I did a quick search on the comments page for "he"+"him" and found nothing referring to foone, and was about to congratulate HN for getting it right, and then thought to scroll to the bottom of the page and found a dozen dead/autocollapsed comments, most including the wrong pronouns. At least they're where they belong.
Never trust a system that seems to be working
361–370 of 376 posts
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#362Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty much every car made since the 1980s has had dual-circuit brakes with usually one front and one rear wheel cylinder on each circuit. Volvo being Volvo took it further with their 2-series cars in the 1970s and 1980s, where the front discs had four-pot calipers configured as two sets of two-pot calipers. Each braking circuit had one half of each front caliper and one rear caliper, so in the event of one half of t…
Yeah - but as we saw with the floormat/unintended acceleration, many people don't think of it in an emergency (all the fatalities could have been avoided by shifting into neutral in those cases, might have blown up the engine but wouldn't have crashed/killed).
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#363Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty much every car made since the 1980s has had dual-circuit brakes with usually one front and one rear wheel cylinder on each circuit. Volvo being Volvo took it further with their 2-series cars in the 1970s and 1980s, where the front discs had four-pot calipers configured as two sets of two-pot calipers. Each braking circuit had one half of each front caliper and one rear caliper, so in the event of one half of t…
There is one subtle difference between automatic transmissions and manual ones and that is the manual one will allow a shift into a lower gear even when engine damage is likely. An automatic one will not, and will hold the current gear until car speed falls within shifting range. Ask me how I know :)
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is one subtle difference between automatic transmissions and manual ones and that is the manual one will allow a shift into a lower gear even when engine damage is likely. An automatic one will not, and will hold the current gear until car speed falls within shifting range. Ask me how I know :)
Yeah, newer ones can be too smart for your own good (but not theirs) - older ones had no problem with you slamming it into reverse or park at freeway speeds - ask me how I know!
It appears that ZF 4HP20/4HP22 gearboxes can do this an unlimited number of times without apparently being damaged, but I'm not trying it on either of mine.
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks, that's interesting. I can see why it's easier for him to tweet in that case. But still doesn't change the fact that an article is easier to consume for the reader.
Foone is a them, not a him. And yeah, you're right, it's definitely easier for the reader, but the author isn't required to make it easy for their audience -- if it was, Judith Butler wouldn't Judith...Butle and James Joyce wouldn't James Joyce. Foone writes tweets, 149k people have chosen to read their tweets. Personally, while I agree a blog'd be nice, I'm just glad foone makes their knowledge available.
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#366Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Doesn't that broadly seem like a problem? Given the preferred pronouns here are "they/them", which is what people ought to be using if they don't know, the problem stems from people inherently assuming "he/him" for any technical work. That's a problem beyond just trans/gnc issues.
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#367Earlier quoted context omitted.
I did a quick search on the comments page for "he"+"him" and found nothing referring to foone, and was about to congratulate HN for getting it right, and then thought to scroll to the bottom of the page and found a dozen dead/autocollapsed comments, most including the wrong pronouns. At least they're where they belong.
the hateful comments about them having mental illnesses and so on are also terrible (i.e. noduerme in this thread)
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#368Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, newer ones can be too smart for your own good (but not theirs) - older ones had no problem with you slamming it into reverse or park at freeway speeds - ask me how I know!
According to the other guy that founded the Range Rover forum I run, in the 1990s when they were getting P38s as traffic cars the training for "really really stop right now" was to throw it into reverse at 70mph and plant the throttle. It appears that ZF 4HP20/4HP22 gearboxes can do this an unlimited number of times without apparently being damaged, but I'm not trying it on either of mine.
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is one subtle difference between automatic transmissions and manual ones and that is the manual one will allow a shift into a lower gear even when engine damage is likely. An automatic one will not, and will hold the current gear until car speed falls within shifting range. Ask me how I know :)
Depends on the gearbox. Really modern ones won't, anything more than about ten years old will downshift if you select a lower gear.
Re: Never trust a system that seems to be working
#370Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thats why JavaScript has both undefined and null!
Do we really need to differentiate between undef and null?