While having algorithms and computers dictating every aspect of train movements, crew scheduling, resource allocation is efficient and in a sense optimal, I think there's something compelling to be said about having a system that can survive with human-rememberable patterns when such an optimizer fails. That it can fall back on (or have at the core) simple patterns that people can still operate without algorithmic in…
There is an Isac Asimov book about this. A crew is stranded in space, because of a computer malfunction and no one on board remembers how they used to be programmed.
Due to failure in the IT system, it is not possible to run any trains today
361–365 of 365 posts
Re: Due to failure in the IT system, it is not possible to run any trains today
#362Earlier quoted context omitted.
> with people posting where they were/going and picking up other travellers. That’s ludicrous, I wish people helping other people this way was more common.
Imagine if we did that all the time! An online ride board.
Re: Due to failure in the IT system, it is not possible to run any trains today
#363Re: Due to failure in the IT system, it is not possible to run any trains today
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
SAP are more known for ERP than CRM They're absolutely colossal in size My ex-girlfiend's father is an engineer there in Baden-Wurttemberg - I'd characterise them as closer to something like Oracle rather than Salesforce
> I'd characterise them [SAP] as closer to something like Oracle rather than Salesforce They feel more like IBM, but more crusty, more conservative and more corporate. Working for a railway on anything touching SAP sounds like an absolute nightmare of wasting decades threading water with nothing to show for it. (I saw a bit of SAP inside DB… nope nope nope)
Edit: no offence intended to anyone at SAP, IBM or Oracle - I do think each company has a legitimate role to play for rather different markets
Re: Due to failure in the IT system, it is not possible to run any trains today
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe if we paid those who teach better, we'd attract the best of the best to teach. Instead we drive good people out by making the job unbearable.
> Maybe if we paid those who teach better, we'd attract the best of the best to teach. I agree struggling for basic survival as a public servant is not ideal, but be careful not to turn education into a lucrative opportunity where people come for money not passion. Money is certainly not the only way to attract talent (though teachers still need to pay their bills) and in most schools i've attended the talented teach…
What exactly are the downsides of an increase in intelligent people competing for teaching positions?