Live data from Hacker News

California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

taxfoundation.org

361–363 of 363 posts

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s why you tax soft drinks instead of taxing weight directly. It may be difficult to lose weight but it isn’t particularly difficult to cut out the most extremely unhealthy foods.

I’d be ok with that, but I don’t think it’s all that simple to cut out unhealthy foods. One, most healthy foods are pretty expensive and a lot of unhealthy foods are not. It can be difficult for people on a tight budget to eat healthy. You also need to consider that a sugar tax can hit lower income people a bit harder.

You could use the tax income to subsidize healthy foods. Or just redistribute it to low income people.

It cuts in many ways: save money and gain health by drinking water/tea/coffee instead of softdrinks. Use the money for healthier foods.

Re: California Considers Doubling Its Taxes

#362
post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no free market for expensive, emergency care. You're not going to drive to Nevada to get cheaper care while you're having a heart attack. There's no free market for health insurance for the people who need care. Insurers don't want those people as customers, not from any state. They're money losers. What pressure is there to lower costs? Why would they charge less?

Competition

Why would a competing insurer want to insure someone with cancer? They'd be guaranteed to lose money. Where is the competition?
Post reply on HN