Live data from Hacker News

O.mg Cable

shop.hak5.org

361–370 of 555 posts

Re: O.mg Cable

#361
post #186

Who buys this stuff? Other things in the shop: > Screen Crab: This covert inline screen grabber sits between HDMI devices - like a computer and monitor, or console and television - to quietly capture screenshots. Perfect for sysadmins, pentesters and anyone wanting to record what's on a screen. > Shark Jack: This portable network attack tool is a pentesters best friend optimized for social engineering engagements and…

Judging from the people who I see at DEFCON who follow the "Hak5" people, it's mostly kids and not professionals.

Re: O.mg Cable

#362
post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You imply hacking human minds to be more acceptable than hacking computers?

Absolutely. It's the human mind's responsibility not to be "hacked", by which I assume you mean exploited to e.g. mindlessly scroll Facebook all day. If most people are weak enough to become matrix-like slaves to the machine, so be it. I don't believe in free will and I don't think we need to preserve human life in a certain way (e.g. the way our ancestors lived). Sure, a lot of people will fail this test, or maybe t…

If you don't accept that you have free will, than nothing you write or say has any meaning.

Re: O.mg Cable

#363
post #139
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We just broke the locks on the cages with a screwdriver. Locks only keep honest people honest.

I don't expect good locks to keep people out. I expect good locks to be tamper evident so I know I can't trust my system.

> I don't expect good locks to keep people out. I expect good locks to be tamper evident so I know I can't trust my system.

The term for what you want is a "seal", not a lock.

Re: O.mg Cable

#364
post #356
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most locks can be picked by a child with a hair pin. I would know. I grew up as that child opening every door and safe I could to amuse myself. If a door is broken then a lock did its job. It let you know you were broken into.

Cheaper if the lock is broken. Locks (that are broken easily) are cheaper than doors, which are not hard to break and expensive to fix Who is going to pick a lock that is cheap and easy to break?

Even cheaper just to leave the door unlocked, I suppose.

Re: O.mg Cable

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is the NSA so good at coming up with sweet codenames for things? I swear it's someone's full time job there.

The real answer? Because these people are just like us, geeks, nerds, techies, early adopters. They are just the same people we live and work with. The film Enemy of the State (1998) was science fiction except with the parts where the techy operators were just normal nerds like us. That what was most scary part of the film not the (at the time fantastic) surveillance.

And let's not forget that many of them are probably browsing HN at this very moment. They could be you, they could be me!

Re: O.mg Cable

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suspect Croatia might have better law enforcement and attorneys than SF does (look up Chesa Boudin)

Ah yes, the solution to crime in the country with the highest incarceration rate, is more incarceration!

If you google "Chesa Boudin" and hit question box marked What Did Chesa Boudin Do? It reveals thus

"Then, in November, Boudin did something no San Francisco DA had done before: He charged a police officer with homicide, for the killing of an unarmed Black man in 2017"

so maybe you're going off a little half-cocked

Re: O.mg Cable

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just wanted to point out that obtaining a security clearance is not nearly as hard as you make it sound. For most organizations prior recreational drug use does not preclude you from the clearance.

I have a clearance and a somewhat checkered past. A lot of what they look for is consistency in accounts of previous behaviors between you and any references / interviews they undertake, trying to assess if you're currently honest. Another big thing they are trying to decide is if you are blackmailable. (throwaway because I have the sort of clearance you are not supposed to advertise that you have)

Can confirm (source: I have a friend that works for a three-letter agency). Before I sit for a clearance interview, I asked him about it. I used to think I'd probably be disqualified, but I learned that was not the case at all. Much of what they're trying to determine is your exposure to potential blackmail.

Re: O.mg Cable

#368
post #356
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most locks can be picked by a child with a hair pin. I would know. I grew up as that child opening every door and safe I could to amuse myself. If a door is broken then a lock did its job. It let you know you were broken into.

Cheaper if the lock is broken. Locks (that are broken easily) are cheaper than doors, which are not hard to break and expensive to fix Who is going to pick a lock that is cheap and easy to break?

> Who is going to pick a lock that is cheap and easy to break?

Probably a criminal who is trying to be quiet, so they can enter your house.

Re: O.mg Cable

#369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are really quite unlike us. And our sets of norms is, shall we say, somewhat different to theirs.

Morality is the difference. That's not exactly "norms" but somewhat on an adjacent path. But in terms of interest and participation in our club, *they are us*. That's the true terrible reality. A more accessible idea which is quite different but allows some truth to shine in similarly is to consider how many of us are utterly dependent on advertising in our careers but we all adblock personally.

> That's not exactly "norms" but somewhat on an adjacent path. But in terms of interest and participation in our club, they are us. That's the true terrible reality.

I remember "Spot the Fed" at DEF CON where I thought it was reflecting this deep and kind of intractable antagonism between the hackers and the government. It turned out that the government was regularly recruiting people there and at other hacker conferences, fairly successfully, and still does. (First I thought that all computer nerds would be at least somewhat anti-military or anti-surveillance, and then I thought that at least those who actively associate themselves with computer culture and counterculture would be, and now I don't really think either of those.)

The social distance between people working for spy agencies and people who vocally criticize and oppose the spy agencies is tiny. I worked at EFF and I've known socially, or kind-of-socially, four people I can immediately think of who worked directly for NSA at some point in their careers, and those are, of course, just the ones who chose to mention it. I've also seen someone unsuccessfully try to recruit someone for NSA face-to-face right in front of me, and had a boss whose next job was alongside an NSA alum.

I also think that NSA alums are more likely to mention it because they're less likely to have worked under false pretenses in other countries (compared to, say, CIA alums).

I had a relative who was a super-huge computer nerd (the biggest computer nerd in my whole family, possibly more than myself, and taught me a lot of my early Unix knowledge) who had previously held a clearance and worked in aerospace engineering (I think on radars or something). He didn't work for a spy agency, but did work on military projects. And nobody could hold a candle to his Unix expertise.

It's pretty striking how diverse in our beliefs we all are (not just about surveillance and espionage, but kind of on every issue and question). Maybe we don't notice it because of social pressures to act like we agree more than we do. Being fascinated with surveillance and secrecy is a common trait in our circles, but it seems that might translate into trying to fight it, or into trying to do it.

Re: O.mg Cable

#370
We should not allow the Fed to stifle innovation and technological progress. If we are not willing to take risks, then we will never be able to reach out true potential of becoming a truly advanced space faring civilization and a multi-planetary species. The NHTSA does not have the technological capability to understand advanced AI used in Autopilot and Full Self Driving and they should stop their interference immediately. I have a Tesla and I bought the Full Self Driving package. I believe it is far more valuable than the current price. I am willing to pay 30 times more for Full Self Driving.
Post reply on HN