Live data from Hacker News

Brave Search beta

search.brave.com

361–370 of 697 posts

Re: Brave Search beta

#361

Loving Brave search so far, but I am wondering if there is a way to manually add sites to the index? Adding them to the Google index and hoping for Brave to pick them up doesn't seem like a clean solution.

Brave can't get the site from Google index (well they can but that would get them sued out of existence). You add to Bing to get a site on DDG and Brave search.

Re: Brave Search beta

#362
post #345

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As I said in my other comment[1], you might be interested in using !sp which gives you the same results without Google tracking [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27598042

Startpage is owned by an adtech company now.

that doesn't change the fact that there are no trackers and the fact that it uses Google results

Re: Brave Search beta

#363

How does Brave plan to handle relations with law enforcement and their requests? Will Brave offer a mechanism to uniquely identify the most offensive users?

Not sure what you're referring to here; Brave doesn't have any user data. We don't collect it to begin with. We believe in Can't be Evil over Don't be Evil .

If you return a result that came from Bing and law enforcement want it gone (because it is illegal for whatever reason) do Brave remove it from the results or do Bing? Both have problems but I'd like to know which route Brave take.

Re: Brave Search beta

#364

I really like that they are pulling SO answers into their results: https://search.brave.com/search?q=strpos+php

Yes, if they asked for permission (and pay if asked). Otherwise it is the same as what Google was sued over. I wonder if they did ask first.

Re: Brave Search beta

#365

Not that they’re required to do so and more choice can be good, but why didn’t they work with DDG? I see they’ve gone ahead and stolen the bangs (!w) feature for themselves.

DDG just uses Bing results. This solution is completely independent. You may ask why that's needed, just recently DDG was censoring the "tank man" photo on the anniversary of Tiananmen Square because Bing was censoring it. This new indexer is very much welcome and I hope it stays free of censorship from the CCP, marxists, and others.

>This solution is completely independent.

It is not. It is Cliqz tailcat plus Bing. Censorship from Bing will end up at brave too.

Re: Brave Search beta

#366
post #46

Previous related discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26328758 If things go as planned, this may become a paid, ad-free, zero-tracking search engine. I can't express how exciting this is to me. Over the past few years, I have made several attempts to replace Google Search with DuckDuckGo. But they have all failed and I always ended up changing the default search engine back to Google. I mean, DDG worked f…

so you're saying it would be better then DDG just because u r paying money for it?

Re: Brave Search beta

#367
> On 6 June 2020, a Twitter user pointed out that Brave inserts affiliate referral codes when users type a URL of Binance into the address bar, which earns Brave money. Further research revealed that Brave redirects the URLs of other cryptocurrency exchange websites, too. In response to the backlash from the users, Brave's CEO apologized and called it a "mistake" and said "we're correcting".

Brave is just a "pop-privacy" company. I will skip this one...

Re: Brave Search beta

#368

I wish them luck. More competition in search is welcome. I don't think I will use it very often though because accuracy in search results trumps any concern I have with privacy online that I get from using google or bing.

part of the accuracy comes from google knowing who you are and what you typically search for.

If accuracy means creating a personal echo chamber, then I'm against this kind of accuracy

Re: Brave Search beta

#369
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In December '19 the company that would end up being acquired by Brave did a number of blog posts [0] where they explained the tech. The short answer is 'a lot of word2vec'. [0] https://www.0x65.dev/

why is Brave calling them Tailcat? The company was Cliqz, not Tailcat.

I think Cliqz's search engine was called Tailcat
Post reply on HN