Live data from Hacker News

Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

axios.com

361–370 of 535 posts

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#361

Ah shit, another site for my /etc/hosts I wonder reddit would be even more useless for me since half the content is from giphy.

You're probably thinking of imgur, which lost some steam when Reddit added their own image hosting. Only a few dozen giphy links get posed each day: https://www.reddit.com/domain/giphy.com/new/

Adding to that, I think gfycat should be more used than giphy, at least based on how much gfycat content I see there

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#362
post #183

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't grok this trend at all. All these replies in the form of memes make me feel like I'm in the Darmok episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. I'm grateful communication on MatterMost at my company has not seen the need for reaction gifs emerge; the wildest thing we have is a custom emoji of a dancing banana.

“Grok” is actually a cultural reference; it is a made-up word from a very famous science fiction book. When people use it, it looks the same to me like if they were using “Live long and prosper” in casual conversation.

I think grok has escaped it's sci-fi niche now - I learned it as a vocab word in English class when I was in school over a decade ago.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#363
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most likely because their operational costs are borderline obscene due to reliance on Google Cloud for their ML pipeline and moving all their metadata to dynamodb.

ML? For what? It’s not like it finds the GIF you’re looking for. Serious question.

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/gcp/building-a-better...

They are literally setting money on fire.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use emojis a lot in Slack and texting. They can remove some accidental ambiguity in your writing, by making your intent clear. For example, the tongue out emoji can work to make sure people know you're being sarcastic.

Emojis can have ambiguity too. My friends and have been using the eye roll emoji to signal we're being sarcastic for about 10 years. The un-animated version of this emoji looks like "I'm not really thinking what I'm saying", especially on Discord/Twitter. I've recently a colleague who used the tongue out emoji for sarcasm and the eye roll one for, well, eye rolling with disdain in reaction to something. The first cha…

That really is interesting, because as far as I'm aware, I've only seen (and used) the eye roll emoji for, well, eye rolling. At least the iOS one also looks very disdainful to me. So if you had written "you should have tested this " to me, I would indeed have felt pretty bad about it. A more appropriate use would be something like "I walked all the way to there, but they turned me away because they bungled up my appointment ", i.e. something commiserate about. And based on my observation and recollection, I really don't think I'm in the minority here.

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use emojis a lot in Slack and texting. They can remove some accidental ambiguity in your writing, by making your intent clear. For example, the tongue out emoji can work to make sure people know you're being sarcastic.

They can also be ambiguous. Some people think "high five" emojis are actually "prayer hands". Which convey wildly different reactions to something. Told your friend your Dad was diagnosed with cancer? high five

It's definitely a "praying" emoji, the whole high five thing is an urban myth.

The official spec[1] calls it "PERSON WITH FOLDED HANDS".. the keyword there is "person" (in contrast to, for example, "1FAC2;PEOPLE HUGGING" when there is multiple people). The emoji is of a single person folding their hands, which really isn't a high five unless you're somehow high five-ing yourself.

[1]ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#367
post #314

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a great match. They're both hype-mongering companies which add no value whatsoever to society.

Am I out of touch? No, it's the 1.6B daily active users who are wrong.

Sooo wait... You mean if more people smoke and more people drank, and more people did drugs... Then that means that it is good ?

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#368
post #348

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder what happened to employees who joined later on, with underwater options.

Not much, I'd imagine. It'd be like getting FB stock options upon joining and having it drop in price when the stock market tanked in March. That's the point of stock.

Presumably they were accelerated/repurchased out for $0? Replaced by ... what exactly? As a giphy employee what do you get out of the acquisiton beyond maybe some job security?

Re: Facebook to Buy Giphy for $400M

#370
post #325
post #299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Won't that tracking capability be going away pretty soon?

Cookie-based tracking, sure. But there are plenty of other avenues for fingerprinting. This[1] help doc from Adobe Analytics even makes reference to a Subscriber ID header you can get mobile carriers to give you, if you get onto the carrier's whitelist. Nothing the vendors do device/browser-side to restrict tracking will help if your mobile carrier is transparently appending an identifying header to your request afte…

This doesn't work for SSL enabled websites, right?
Post reply on HN