Live data from Hacker News

Waymo in Portland

waymo.com

351–360 of 607 posts

Re: Waymo in Portland

#351
post #293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The cost of providing a bus exceeds the cost of operating a car in many cases, like lower population density neighborhoods. It may save the public money to centralize transit on major corridors and then subsidize trips on Waymo in some areas and at some times.

how many people can fit in a bus compared to a car?

The OP you're responding suggested using Waymo's to help fill the buses, not get rid of buses.

Re: Waymo in Portland

#352

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even five dollars a ride would be twice the price. It's just not comparable.

How many tax dollars go into subsidizing a public transit ride? Varies from place to place but it's not insignificant.

https://trimet.org/budget/pdf/2026-adopted-budget.pdf

Tax revenue was $555mm

https://trimet.org/about/pdf/trimetridership.pdf

~122,300,000 rides (originating + boarding)

So about $4.53 per ride.

The Portland metro is ~2.5mm people, so about $222/resident/yr.

Portland metro area residents pay on average about sixty cents per day to subsidize TriMet.

Roughly 1/43rd the average cost of ownership for a new car in Oregon.

https://info.oregon.aaa.com/how-much-does-it-really-cost-to-...

Re: Waymo in Portland

#353

I wonder how long Google will continue to subsidize this at a substantial loss? Estimated $30–40 billion spent in the last decade that only really pays off if they dominate the market.

I bet they've hit operating breakeven a couple years ago. If they hadn't they wouldn't have been expanding. Expanding while you have an operating loss means the loss would be expanding alongside the service. I'm not seeing that in the numbers.

Re: Waymo in Portland

#354
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't matter if there's only four people willing to ride on a given schedule.

That is an argument for buses on well-designed routes and schedules, not an argument against buses. It is like saying “that bus would be useless at the bottom of a lake” well, yeah. The first step would be not driving it into a lake

It depends on the population density. You may have a perfectly well designed route for the area, but there are only so many people per hour that want to take a trip. You can delete routes and make people walk further, but that makes the trip take longer and not everyone can or wants to walk a long ways to the bus stop.

Different population densities have different optimal vehicle sizes. It's the same reason a small city airport might have one or two regional jets per day serving it instead of 2 747s per week.

Re: Waymo in Portland

#355
post #4

I've determined that my ultimate dream car would be something like a Rivian but with Waymo tech, so I can drive it manually when I want/need (snowstorms, off-road), but I can also let it drive me across the country at night while I camp in the back. Would absolutely change the way we move across the US, especially if you have hobbies that involve a lot of gear and equipment.

I want this as well. Hopefully my Cybertruck will get unsupervised driving someday, but until then, it's the closest thing to the dream of electric off-roading, self-driving vehicle with huge cargo capacity. I've already stopped driving myself around 98% of the time, according to my FSD stats.

Re: Waymo in Portland

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is an argument for buses on well-designed routes and schedules, not an argument against buses. It is like saying “that bus would be useless at the bottom of a lake” well, yeah. The first step would be not driving it into a lake

It depends on the population density. You may have a perfectly well designed route for the area, but there are only so many people per hour that want to take a trip. You can delete routes and make people walk further, but that makes the trip take longer and not everyone can or wants to walk a long ways to the bus stop. Different population densities have different optimal vehicle sizes. It's the same reason a small c…

Yep, you definitely want a range of bus sizes. Some areas are served perfectly well with a couple of these

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Minotour

Re: Waymo in Portland

#357
post #65
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Snowstorms are probably when I’d most want self driving. Back in February driving from Tahoe to SF, they closed the road, not because of conditions, but because too many impatient drivers spun out. I trust Waymo to go the recommended speed and not get impatient.

After skiing in Utah, I wonder why the driving conditions around Tahoe get so bad. In comparison, for most places around Salt Lake/Park City, you never need chains or 4-wheel drive.

It simply snows a lot more in Tahoe from a SWE standpoint. Utah gets similar "inches" of snow, but fractions of the moisture, which if you've ever built a snowman you know the difference between the heavy thick stuff and the powder that doesn't clump. Utah gets the powder, Tahoe gets the sludge (and a ton of it).

Re: Waymo in Portland

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IIRC, in SF they're slightly more expensive before tip, but having ridden in them in SF, LA, and AZ I've always felt they were cheaper. Over the long run, they will probably end up being cheaper from the wholesale perspective since eventually the parts and technology cost will come down with time and scale while human wages will continue to rise. That said, it doesn't really matter if they're cheaper as long as they'…

Alphabet/Google/Waymo is a technology business, with emphasis on business. They're not running a charity. They're in it to make money. If it's a $20 Uber ride to somewhere, they're not going to leave money on the table and charge $10 because they don't have a driver to pay. They're going to charge $22 for the premium experience because they know people will pay that.

Of course, but I never claimed that they would do that. At some point though other autonomous services will enter the market and Waymo will have to compete with them on price. Even if that doesn't happen (which seems incredibly unlikely), they're still competing against public transit and people driving themselves (or privately owned self driving cars). Not having to pay a driver means the floor where they can make a profit is lower.

If we're in a world where human driven Uber's are $30, you're right that Waymo probably won't charge $20 just to be nice, even if it only costs them $10. They might charge $20 though if their data shows that it would 10x the number of riders or if they're also competing with another autonomous taxi company.

Re: Waymo in Portland

#359
post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Trains are great I wonder how much that sentiment is that based on steampunk and 1880's nostalgia?

Also just like... looking at a train and noticing it can carry a ton more people than a car, has no concept of traffic, and can theoretically go as fast as possible.

But in practice runs empty most of the time, is commonly delayed by any problem on the line or station, and operates on a very limited schedule.

Re: Waymo in Portland

#360
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Brightline in Florida was able to get around this buy working in an existing highway ROW. And will probably go bankrupt this year: https://www.wlrn.org/business/2026-01-23/brightline-business...

Oof their debt is now considered junk bonds huh. They missed some loan interest payments? Yeah not looking good...

I tried to ride it a few times, but could never find a way it made logistical or financial sense.
Post reply on HN