Earlier quoted context omitted.
The mission of the astronauts on board is to test the damn Orion spacecraft in preparation for a human landing on the moon. > NASA flight controller and instructor Robert Frost explained the reasoning plainly in a post on Quora (via Forbes). “A Windows laptop is used for the same reasons a majority of people that use computers use Windows. It is a system that people are already familiar with. Why make them learn a ne…
Maybe he should have designed the rest of the controls to look like the cockpit of 2003 Toyota Camry. It is a system that people are already familiar with. And actually reliable.
Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
351–360 of 379 posts
Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're almost certainly using an Exchange server; Outlook is not (just) an email app. Attachments are not being sent via smtp.
Great, one more thing that can fail. Does anyone remember, that some time ago lots of people were in panic, because Exchange servers had a vulnerability on "high severity" level, and people everywhere had to patch their Exchange servers, if they didn't rent them from a service provider? Can't wait to see that happening again, this time affecting an Exchange server used by astronauts in space!
Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe he should have designed the rest of the controls to look like the cockpit of 2003 Toyota Camry. It is a system that people are already familiar with. And actually reliable.
Toyota actually is involved in the Artemis program. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Cruiser
Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#354Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
The current solution is literally causing problems in space. Space-grade engineering is expensive, but having things go wrong on your already very expensive mission is even more expensive.
Until we've had this failure, I do agree that using COTS software was the logical choice. And now we know better.
Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#356Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#357Even having one instance running should have been immediate whole of NASA five fire alarm type of situation.
Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#358Re: Artemis computer running two instances of MS outlook; they can't figure out why
#359The point is not running Windows or Outlook on a PC in space. The point is that the Software was not sealed, downloading upgrades while in space, sending telemetry back to Microsoft (or to whoever else). Those PC are like any other instrument onboard the spacecraft: it's status needs to be known and predictable by NASA. Not to talk about the amount of unknown and unpredictable extra traffic caused by those PCs onto t…
Hope that the `metered connection` option was toggled on.
Windows update in space has to be a banned torture method.