[flagged]
Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
351–360 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#352I almost predicted that on Friday https://blog.krzyzanowskim.com/2026/03/30/shipping-snake-oil... so close to when comedy become reality
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#353Undercover mode also pretends to be human, which I'm less ok with: https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94...
You'll never win this battle, so why waste feelings and energy on it? That's where the internet is headed. There's no magical human verification technology coming to save us.
Negative sentiment towards technological destiny detected in human agent.
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#354Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#355They have an interesting regex for detecting negative sentiment in users prompt which is then logged (explicit content): https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94... I guess these words are to be avoided...
An LLM company using regexes for sentiment analysis? That's like a truck company using horses to transport parts. Weird choice.
Using some ML to derive a sentiment regex seems like a good actually?
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because they actually want it to work 100% of the time and cost nothing.
Then they made it wrong. For example, "What the actual fuck?" is not getting flagged, neither is "What the *fuck*".
It is exceedingly obvious that the goal here is to catch at least 75-80% of negative sentiment and not to be exhaustive and pedantic and think of every possible way someone could express themselves.
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's how people resisted CGI back in the day. What people dislike is low quality. There is a loud subset who are really against it on principle like we also have people who insist on analog music but regular people are much more practical but they don't post about this all day on the internet.
I think literally everyone could agree CGI has been detrimental to the quality of films.
"Literally everyone" can't even agree on whether Polio is bad.
I myself would disagree that CGI itself is a bad thing.
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also saw this on twitter earlier, thought someone was just making a fake hype post thing. But turns out to be an actual prompt for capybara huh: https://github.com/chatgptprojects/claude-code/blob/642c7f94...
One tengentially interesting thing about that is how THEY talk to Claude. "Don't blow your cover" Interesting to see them be so informal and use an idiom to a computer. And using capitals for emphasis.
It’s trained on mostly internet content, right?
If it learned language based on how the internet talks, then the best way to communicate is using similar language.
Re: Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well what is Anthropic doing differently to deal with this issue? Apparently they don't write any of their own code anymore, and they're doing fine.
Nothing, apparently, which is probably why Claude Code has 7893 open issues on Github at the time of writing.
All software that’s popular has hundreds or thousands of issues filed against it. It’s not an objective indication of anything other than people having issues to report and a willingness and ability to report the issue.
It doesn’t mean every issue is valid, that it contains a suggestion that can be implemented, that it can be addressed immediately, etc. The issue list might not be curated, either, resulting in a garbage heap.