Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let me repeat: They are about to annex a sovereign nation while reducing the capital city to rubble. May or may not remind you of another country further north.
> remind you of another country further north It would remind me of that if Ukraine attacked first... over and over again throughout the last decades... together with it's allies in the region... occasionally abducting a few hundred Russia civilians... there is no parallel here.
Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
351–360 of 419 posts
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
>the fact that Democrats continue to be the opposition party, and failed to even imprison Trump over four years for the things he'd done I'd like to point out it was NOT the Democrats who failed us , it was Republicans in congress who failed us. I'm really not sure how you can suggest Democrats failed us, when they had 2 successful impeachments against trump, but it was Senate Republicans that voted to not remove him…
Thanks for this. It’s amazing how quickly people are trying to rewrite history.
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not that complicated. Elect a Democrat in 2028 who will nominate a strong AG, not a useless ditherer like Garland. What a disgraceful tenure he had. If he was going to take so long to bring charges he should have just avoided it. Instead he takes 3 years to bring all these charges which naturally look like election interference and as such are paused until they choke the election away and the new justice departm…
The last dem did shit
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#354Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#355Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for this. It’s amazing how quickly people are trying to rewrite history.
You are thanking the guy who said "it was and always is the Republicans who fail is" for being true to history?
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you run the numbers: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504505 You will see, that anything else other than a ground invasion, is guaranteed to give Iran a war victory.
The loss of ability to intercept missiles does not mean that the war is lost for America. It just means that it now has to contend with more of its own losses during the war. America always goes to war with the handicap that 1 American life is worth hundreds of enemy lives. This handicap is why one gets the impression (illusion) that countries like Iran are able to hold their own against the great mighty USA. But if…
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#357I'm not sure if this is parody or not, but someone admitted to it. These days it wouldn't surprise me if it were this brazen. https://x.com/gothburz/status/2036413487530831899
I thought people knew not to believe anything they read online?
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
Iran can block the Strait of Hormuz indefinitely. They are demanding war reparations from the United States. Since Trump won't do that, the best case scenario seems to be that one or more third parties - Europe, India, Japan, Saudi Arabia, etc. - offer(s) Iran a package of financial incentives and security assurances which convince Iran to end the war. If only Muad'dib were here. He could find a way through.
What's the spice?
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#359Well if Democrats ever win, there will be a lot of fine investigations for years ahead.
Re: Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny
#360People got exactly what they voted for. It would be hilarious, if it wasn't so serious.
Honestly? It’s all pretty boring.