Live data from Hacker News

Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

dell.com

351–360 of 370 posts

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#351
post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Denser pixels are worth less because you can't see them; in this case 3x-4x less.

You CAN see then, you CANNOT distinguish them apart without a closer look.

It would be a really ineffective monitor if you couldn't see the pixels.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#352

1. I don't think I'll ever buy Dell again. My current monitor is a Dell S3221QS 32" screen and it has vertical lines and starts flickering on both the Macbook M1 and the Mac Studio with the M4 Max chip after some time, which is a known issue[0][1]. It also defaults to YPbPr colors rather than RGB/SRGB, so the colors look off. I'm using HDMI to HDMI connectivity currently. Part of it is also my fault as I thought a mo…

I have the 27" from that series. In my experience, after I fixed the RGB issue, I also fixed the flickering issue. And to fix the RGB issue, I used BetterDisplay[1], controlled by a Hammerspoon[2] script[3] that calls its CLI on the appropriate display events.

The free version of BetterDisplay is sufficient, I really don't use any of its other features.

The flickering seems to be gamma related, and is triggered by Nightshift or Flux for me.

[1] https://github.com/waydabber/BetterDisplay#readme

[2] https://www.hammerspoon.org/

[3] https://github.com/wlonkly/dotfiles/blob/master/home/.hammer...

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#353

1. I don't think I'll ever buy Dell again. My current monitor is a Dell S3221QS 32" screen and it has vertical lines and starts flickering on both the Macbook M1 and the Mac Studio with the M4 Max chip after some time, which is a known issue[0][1]. It also defaults to YPbPr colors rather than RGB/SRGB, so the colors look off. I'm using HDMI to HDMI connectivity currently. Part of it is also my fault as I thought a mo…

Counter-anecdata: I have 2 Dell U2720Q (Ultrasharp 27") bought in 2021 and they've been great. That said, I've always stuck for Dell's upper-range Ultrasharp (U prefix in models) monitors, being slightly wary of their cheaper series which the S in your S3221QS implies.

Yes, the flickering problem is definitely an S-series issue.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#355
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This has pixels the size of my hand This is 128 ppi, which would be considered "retina" at a viewing distance of 70cm (27in). Are you really sitting 2 feet from a 52" monitor? I'd have to cutout a curve in the front of my desk to sit that close

> This is 128 ppi, which would be considered "retina“ If by “retina” we mean “pleasantly sharp”, not by me. I’m never buying less than the 218 ppi of my Apple Studio Display unless I absolutely have to. I’m totally spoiled.

I think the point was that people care about ppd, not ppi. 218 ppi would be too low if the screen is 1 inch from your eye or too high if it’s 100 inches from your eye.

Retina probably means 60 ppd.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, sure, but you're basically saying "anything other than the absolute top-end displays are absolutely awful". 133 PPI is going to be higher pixel density than >99% of desktop monitors that people are actually using. e.g. The Steam hardware survey only goes down to 0.23% usage, and doesn't have any >4K resolution listed.

It’s a $3000 monitor, so yeah, other top end monitors are what I’m going to compare it to.

You said 4K@33" is "awful". That's not $3k territory, that's what you get for $300.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#357
post #157

I have 3 27" 5k monitors in portrait and a 32" 4k horizontal above those. It is all mounted with vesa cheeseplates to manfrotto magic arms on t slot aluminum attached to a C stand with manfrotto super clamps. I also have two genelec studio monitors which sound amazing. All of that cost less than this one monitor.

That sounds like an ergonomics nightmare.

You should strive to sit with your head balanced on top of your neck, with your arms relaxed at your side and elbows at 90 degrees. wrist rest. good seating position. no donut cushion. etc

tilting your head back to look at a monitor above or to the side will use muscles to hold your body in place and misalign your spine/etc. leads to fatigue/stress/long-term issues

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#358
post #305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not OP, but I have 2 8020D + a subwoofer. If I had to do it all over again I would have 2 8030C and no subwoofer.

Also have 2 8020D's but I skimped on the subwoofer. Probably a bad idea, since they deemphasize the lows so much, but surprisingly I can crank up them up on my mixer's EQ to make up for it without losing clarity.

Yeah, they are really impressive for 4" drivers.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#359
post #192
post #157

I have 3 27" 5k monitors in portrait and a 32" 4k horizontal above those. It is all mounted with vesa cheeseplates to manfrotto magic arms on t slot aluminum attached to a C stand with manfrotto super clamps. I also have two genelec studio monitors which sound amazing. All of that cost less than this one monitor.

All the brand naming makes this read like something from American Psycho.

Perhaps, but I value this simple explanation of the setup because it serves as a "these parts work well for this purpose" testimony. I'm already familiar with Manfrotto quality but not in this use type. It's nice to have my horizons broadened.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#360
The radius is too big. This monitor is R4200, 4.2m. I have a Samsung odyssey something 49” monitor and it is glorious. It is R1000, and since my head is about a meter from the screen, it works: even the edges are usable.

I used to use two 27” 1440p monitors, which together are about the same size as the Samsung 49”, and also the same resolution, but the edges were further enough away from my head that they were annoying to use. Not to mention the bezels in the middle. While this dell wouldn’t have the bezels, the edges would still be too far away.

The only drawback of my giant R1000 monitor is that I can’t easily use my laptop’s camera. So I don’t; I use an iPad for video conferencing, it sits happily below this monitor.

My only regret is not getting the 57” 2x4k variant!

Post reply on HN