Live data from Hacker News

DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

krebsonsecurity.com

351–360 of 586 posts

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Occam’s razor would also suggest a hoax as one of several very credible possibilities.

Occam's razor would suggest someone from Russia could just use their own IP because people like you would think it's a hoax anyway.

Why does someone from Russia want access to NLRB data, and why would DOGE be immediately leaking just-granted NLRB login credentials to Russian assets when it would be trivially traceable back to them, and if they were in fact granted untraceable/unlogged admin credentials, could legitimately download the data themselves and simply hand it over to said Russian assets if that was their actual intention?

It's not behavior that makes any sense assuming even a semi-rational/intelligent actor.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#353
post #329
post #8

> According to a whistleblower complaint filed last week by Daniel J. Berulis, a 38-year-old security architect at the NLRB, officials from DOGE met with NLRB leaders on March 3 and demanded the creation of several all-powerful “tenant admin” accounts that were to be exempted from network logging activity that would otherwise keep a detailed record of all actions taken by those accounts. Feels like a pretty good Occa…

Interview with whistleblower detailing the attack and the threats directed against him: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/nlrb-whistleblower-claims-...

this guy's lawyer says: This is a difficult topic for Dan to discuss, but prior to our filing the whistle-blower disclosure this week, last week, somebody went to Dan's home and taped a threatening note, a menacing note on his door with personal information.

...

While he was at work, and it also contained photographs of him walking his dog taken by a drone.

This is mafia shit.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#354

this part of the whistleblower complaint seem way worse: " On or about March 11, 2025, NxGen metrics indicated abnormal usage at points the prior week. I saw way above baseline response times, and resource utilization showed increased network output above anywhere it had been historically – as far back as I could look. I noted that this lined up closely with the data out event. I also notice increased logins blocked…

Any guesses for best possible interpretion? The Russians have infiltrated their PCs with keyloggers and DOGE are working from insecure open networks. The worst possible interpretation is straightforward - they are working for the Russians as agents and let the Russians in or installed the keyloggers for Russia.

Isn't it just that the IP router happens to use IPs in Russia as part of the rotation?

If they're trying to exfiltrate data, they might want to rotate through IP addresses in order to obfuscate what's going on or otherwise circumvent restrictions. Using a simple ip rotator like the post talks about would maybe be an approach they'd use. If they're not careful with the IP addresses, once in a while one might get caught due to some restriction like being outside the US. It'd maybe appear as though you're getting these weird requests from Russia, but that's just because you're not logging the requests that are not being flagged from the US.

Maybe I'm reading the post incorrectly though (if so, please correct me!)

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#355
Sorry, but the whole story just reads like a bad mystery novel; tales of Russian hackers, "suspicious" Github repos, somehow-nefarious (docker?) "containers", unspecified threats made (and I quote) in "meat space".

Also interesting to note that not only has Berulis' attorney lead multiple lawsuits against the Trump administration in the past, he was also an intern for both Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton. Now that obviously doesn't prove anything, but it could nonetheless be considered a strong indicator this all might be politically-motivated.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Citation?

Not parent but it’s here - https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/04/whistleblower-doge-sipho... DOGE is a complete clusterfuck. Fwiw I think there is hard to spot fraud in the govt that should be looked at (eg price inflation at the pentagon, VA, Medicaid/Medicare, SS). They should have done the hard work of uncovering that. Instead they just went for clickbait headlines.

> DOGE is a complete clusterfuck.

It depends what the objectives are. My impression is that they have been very successful pursuing their actual objectives, while providing a cover story of a 'clusterfuck'.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#357

> Ge0rg3’s code is “open source,” in that anyone can copy it and reuse it non-commercially. As it happens, there is a newer version of this project that was derived or “forked” from Ge0rg3’s code — called “async-ip-rotator” — and it was committed to GitHub in January 2025 by DOGE captain Marko Elez. Original code: https://github.com/Ge0rg3/requests-ip-rotator Forked: https://github.com/markoelez/async-ip-rotator Code…

>not something you would expect DOGE people to understand or respect

To be fair I see in my daily life folks who copy and paste from stack overflow or random GitHub repo and move on with their day. They ignore the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or whatever license is applied to the code they copied.

I see on this very site people who will share copyrighted articles that are behind a paywall (just because it is on some archive site doesn’t make it right).

Please don’t take this as support for DOGE and the headaches they are causing. To make a cheap jab at a group of people while ignoring the group that you associate with is bad form.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#358
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We'll see. The thing about the law in the US, it's slow and heavy. You'll need to be pretty mighty to move it if it catches up to you.

I would have agreed years ago, but seeing trump - who obviously should be in prison for January 6th, among other crimes - back in the WH pretty much proves the US is not a nation of laws.

People are fighting back. It’s not over yet.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#359

> Ge0rg3’s code is “open source,” in that anyone can copy it and reuse it non-commercially. As it happens, there is a newer version of this project that was derived or “forked” from Ge0rg3’s code — called “async-ip-rotator” — and it was committed to GitHub in January 2025 by DOGE captain Marko Elez. Original code: https://github.com/Ge0rg3/requests-ip-rotator Forked: https://github.com/markoelez/async-ip-rotator Code…

>not something you would expect DOGE people to understand or respect To be fair I see in my daily life folks who copy and paste from stack overflow or random GitHub repo and move on with their day. They ignore the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or whatever license is applied to the code they copied. I see on this very site people who will share copyrighted articles that are behind a paywall (just because it…

irony

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#360

The CEO of Tesla and Space-X; a self-proclaimed high IQ individual, an alleged programmer, has apparently hired a straight-up script kiddie to their elite delta force of technical government downsizers.

I hated Elon Musk long before it was cool: I was a fan of Tesla in the early days, and when I read Musk's "super-secret master plan" for Tesla I thought "yeesh, the board chairman is an idiot, where did they find this bozo?" (I knew a bit about SpaceX but somehow didn't make the connection.) That said, I was surprised to learn much later that, by all accounts, Elon Musk was a competent and resourceful leader in Space…

> That said, I was surprised to learn much later that, by all accounts, Elon Musk was a competent and resourceful leader in SpaceX's early days. Maybe these stories are just his personality cult in action, but I found it plausible

He's good at having and raising money which was what SpaceX needed, I think he was probably the same then as he is now. Reading about his early days at Tesla and the PayPal stuff, I don't really buy the idea he was ever different and took a dark turn. He's the type of person that will never self-regulate and somehow has never faced any negative consequences for lying and self-aggrandizing so has kept pushing it further

Post reply on HN