Live data from Hacker News

I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

news.ycombinator.com

351–360 of 527 posts

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#351
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Green card holders are essentially long term visas with citizenship grants for good behavior No. One of the major distinctions being – CBP cannot deny a green card holder to enter the country. They can try pressure tactics to 'convince' the person to 'voluntarily' give up their green card but, if they don't sign anything, they will still be let in. If there's something off about their case, they may be referred to…

Green cards can be revoked for non residence and commission of crimes.

US Citizenship used to be revoked for these things, but that’s not recent.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#352
post #3

I've seen recent examples of the government targeting green card holders for their speech. As a naturalized citizen who wants to exercise my free speech rights, how concerned should I be about potentially having my citizenship challenged on technical grounds? Are there realistic scenarios where this could happen despite First Amendment protections?

[flagged]

AFAIK he wasn't charged with a crime but it isn't required for deportation.

Check out these articles explaining https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/a-free-speech-right...

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/a-green-card-is-not...

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> essentially long term visas Not visas which are visitation permits. They are non-citizens who live in the United States. This is not visitation. Revoking a green card is akin to expulsion from the country. And can only be used when laws are broken, treason is committed, or terrorism is waged. In the case of the Columbia student, he was accused of terrorism without trial and had his revocation signed single handedly…

> And can only be used when laws are broken, treason is committed, or terrorism is waged. CBP/ICE has a pretty detailed explanation on their website that you can lose permanent resident status by remaining outside of the country for more than one year and failing to retain a bona fide residence and presence in the USA (US job with annual 1040 tax filings, residence, identity documents, etc). I would wager that a scen…

In the distant past the US government claimed US Citizens who lived abroad too long lost their citizenship.

The courts said, “no.”

But the US State Department would still refuse to provide consular services.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#354

If my asylum application gets denied, what options do I have? I came to the U.S. as a minor and have little to no memory of my original country. I applied for asylum in 2016 and have been waiting for an interview ever since. Given my pending status, are there any other pathways to obtaining a Green Card or legal residency that would allow me to travel? Edit Additional Question - Some of us like myself, came to the U.…

Historically, bona fide marriage with US citizen allowed the best way to legalize. I don't know if that changed recently.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#355
post #299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're near a port of entry, you actually can be stopped at any time to be asked for proof of citizenship/visa/etc. See also https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone There are plenty of border patrol stops along highways that never cross a border where you'll be routinely stopped. In practice, that means "near the border with Mexico" where there are border patrol stations along highways well inside the US…

Slight correction: "enhanced" driver licenses are citizen-only, and this is actually checked during issue, so they can also serve as proof of citizenship.

Nope, that’s a decision made by each state.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#356

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She crossed overland. Imagine you do pre-clearance out of a Canadian airport. Can they kidnap you out of country and ship you to a US detention center?

She crossed overland from Mexico for some reason, not from Canada. The linked article says: "Then they came back and told her that, because they were denying her, that they have to send her back to Canada." Is there a policy that requires that people denied entry be returned to the country they are citizens of?

Mexico would have to officially accept her as a deportee. I’m sure it’s possible, but they “can’t” just let her walk back across the border.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#357
post #203
post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no left wing in Israel, you are painting a false narrative. It is a fascist state run by thugs (much like ours, which is probably why they are so eager to sell out Americans to Israel). Children were bombed. They knew the kids were there and they bombed them. Often happily doing it knowing they'd slaughter hundreds to get one supposed terrorist. They bulldozed bodies. They tiktoked the destruction of univers…

The 2021 elections ended with a government of 61 seats, including 7 seats for Labor (left), 6 seats for Meretz (fairly hard left), 4 seats for Ra'am (Islamist), so 25% from what would be considered a "left bloc" from a Western viewpoint. Then Yesh Atid and Blue and White had 17 and 8 respectively, both centrists, so just short of 50%. So there most certainly is a left (albeit small) and a substantial centre. Israel h…

> Israel's military operates according to the laws of war

That’s a highly contested claim and I personally don’t believe it. You can prove it to be false without even looking at their actions in Gaza, just the torture of prisoners.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#358
post #296

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Canadians may be often unprepared and shocked how aggressive and militarized the southern border is, compared to crossing at northern border land entry points.

It is as bad as it has ever been……… But border patrol has always been a bunch of small dick assholes, all the way back to Obama. My wife and I adopted a child from another country. He was 18 months of age at the time. We flew into LAX. We were exhausted from a long flight. We got to customs. Agents approached us and said that they had a few questions and said that I (the father) needed to collect our bags and they wo…

> all the way back to Obama.

I, a natural born US citizen, was a student in the Bush years and I'd drive up to Canada. Coming back, the US guys were always aggro and weird. I had one guy smelling my laundry.

At the time I figured it was some post 9/11 BS.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is a pre-indicated stipulation of the green card validity, not revocation based on the whim of an evaluating (non-immigration judicial) official -- ie CBP and DHS and ICE cannot (read: should not be able to) revoke green cards. The "basic US presence" requirement of green cards has always been present in the validity clause alongside the 5-10year expiry date, and not committing immigration fraud and other basic…

I see your point. Thank you. I think most non legally inclined people (like me) would say CBP yanked my GC. Your point being that - nope, they just enforced the law. Right?

Yes. People are generally familiar with rights that can lapse if eligibility is not maintained - consider the right to vote in state elections, which you lose if you fail to maintain residency in that state. Nobody yanked your state voter registration or your eligibility for in-state tuition, you abandoned it.

Re: I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA

#360
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Advocating for Palestinians isn’t advocating for a “terror group”. Which is itself a nebulous term that is used for political reasons. Now, working to carry out a foreign governments interests against the best interests of the American public IS treason, but that’s okay when you’re the president I guess.

Are you denying that Hamas is a terrorist group? Committing terrorism is literally the central part of their operations. Are you denying that October 7th was terrorism? Are you denying that launching thousands of rockets against Israel to kill as many Jewish people as possible is terrorism?

Can you read the comment you're replying to again please? It doesn't mention Hamas anywhere in it
Post reply on HN