Live data from Hacker News

Why blog if nobody reads it?

andysblog.uk

351–360 of 373 posts

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of plausible deniability

If I find 10 backdated articles appear out of thin air in Waybackmachine I'm not going to ask the author to explain it. It just lowers their credibility in my mind and I move on. I'm not interested in proving to them or in a court of law that they backdated articles.

What if the articles have no date on them at all?

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#352
Blogging also creates something that never existed, and likely never would have existed.

If you believe consciousness is a way for the universe to know itself, then expressing your truth in a blog is a way to participate in that process. The random assortment of atoms that make up "you" are gifting the universe a novel creation that could not have existed otherwise.

Whether you think this is of value is a different topic, but at the very least, it's a neat mindset to slip into IMO.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#353
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. I write differently when I anticipate an audience (even if they never come). Maybe parallel: I notice when, for example, I edit videos in my own world I have a very different take on the edit when I am showing it to someone for the first time. Thinking to myself: "Now as I watch someone else watching it, I am become aware that this scene goes on a bit too long. This cut is a little abrupt, disorienting."…

> I write differently when I anticipate an audience (even if they never come). Is that good, though? If the product is purely for self-consumption, is the audience-anticipating version necessarily the better version? And at what point, after how many unread blog posts, do you rationally stop anticipating an audience?

I don't think I am really "anticipating" an audience. Or it might be my greatest grandkids after I am long dead that I are my audience. It doesn't really matter to me. It's more of a mindset.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#354
post #313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Usually it's a good thing, yes. Because you are forced to communicate clearly, cut the jargon and not dump your stream of consciousness. Instead you pay attention to whether what you're saying is of any value to another person.

> Because you are forced to communicate clearly, cut the jargon and not dump your stream of consciousness. Instead you pay attention to whether what you're saying is of any value to another person. Why is that good, though, if you're the only reader?

It helps you see "what is crap" in your own mind. Sometimes you need the mindset that you are speaking in public to confront those things.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#355
post #352

Blogging also creates something that never existed, and likely never would have existed. If you believe consciousness is a way for the universe to know itself, then expressing your truth in a blog is a way to participate in that process. The random assortment of atoms that make up "you" are gifting the universe a novel creation that could not have existed otherwise. Whether you think this is of value is a different t…

This was a beautiful comment to read. Thank you.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#356
post #349
post #292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From my anecdotal experience, of what my close friends share with me via DM these days, sadly it is indeed 95% video, and it is indeed 95% Instagram / TikTok / Facebook / Twitter / YouTube (in descending order). I continue to share with them 75% long-form articles, and 75% personal web sites / mainstream media web sites.

I actually looked a bit yesterday, and checked FB particularly to see what the situation was, and maybe have my own anecdotal take. At least part of what I found was that there did not seem to be much actual discussion. It didn't really even matter whether it was a video, a text article (like making food), or an event. A huge percentage of "conversations" ended up being nothing more than notification references after…

Yes, I see that all the time on Facebook too, top-most 10% of a thread is actual comments, bottom-most 90% is "Friend McFriendface" name reffing. It's quite annoying.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#357
post #11

Writing on a blog is a very inexpensive way to establish your credibility about different subjects. This pays off later down the line when you can link people to things you've written in the past. Credibility is a very valuable commodity. It's worth investing in ways to build more of it. Don't assume people will stumble across your content (though they will eventually via Google). Actively send links to people who yo…

> Writing on a blog is a very inexpensive way to establish your credibility about different subjects. This pays off later down the line when you can link people to things you've written in the past.

Unfortunately, these days writing a publicly-available blog is also a great way to train AI to replace you at the very job you're establishing credibility in.

Alas, that ship has sailed. So keep writing blogs.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#358
My blog is my memory extender for it-tech related stuff, some posts are public, some are not. And availability is a killer feature, posts are available literally from every device with web browser. Unlock phone, enter site address and that's it. No need to install some sync software etc.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#359
post #252
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a lot of Tiktok accounts for woodworking, but, yeah, unsure how persistent or informative those may be.

And also how searchable it is. The great thing with blogs for me is that I can relatively quickly skip to the part where the information is that I want, because usually I don't need all of it.

Admittedly I do subscribe to a woodworking YouTube channel but I would love more written content for the reasons you describe about skipping and skimming.

Re: Why blog if nobody reads it?

#360
post #324

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where was this? Because in Italy i've never heard of anyone allowed to miss school for that by their parents.

It was in Canada although I don't imagine that has any bearing on the situation. It was also at a Catholic private school that shared the property with the church. I literally walked like 20 meters from the school building across the parking lot to the church and it typically only took 1 hour or so. In my own memory, people would get out of school for all manner of reasons, from sports to even family vacations, for e…

Well I went to a catholic school in Italy and getting out of class was an everyone or none kind of situation.

Going on vacation or even arriving late was very very frowned upon.

So, seems to depend a lot on the country.

Post reply on HN