Earlier quoted context omitted.
Malmquist bias[0] for neighborhood music! It would be hard to find that correlation because you can’t get a base rate. I don’t think you can measure the distance, so you don’t know if it’s loud or close. Maybe there’s no correlation independent of the music taste of the neighborhood. Lots of Spanish doesn’t surprise me. It’s a neighborhood that’s still largely Mexican, and Latin Pop is really big in the US in general…
Malmsteen bias?
Bop Spotter
351–360 of 405 posts
Re: Bop Spotter
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm pretty amused at whoever decided to play KDA at 9:30 last night though.
That's funny because I recognized Annika Wells and had to look up the song without knowing who K/DA was.
(1985) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96mZc82fYGc
(2018) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOxkGD8qRB4
[what if, instead of having eighteenth century style parliament buildings with a bunch of old guys sitting at desks and speaking from time to time, we had political factions settle their disputes in-game on a battle royale level?]
Re: Bop Spotter
#353Re: Bop Spotter
#354Re: Bop Spotter
#355Some details on how this works: https://twitter.com/rtwlz/status/1840821351055311245 The phone has a Tasker script running on loop (even if the battery dies, it’ll restart when it boots again) Script records 10 min of audio in airplane mode, then comes out of airplane mode and connects to nearby free WiFi. Then uploads the audio file to my server, which splits it into 15 sec chunks that slightly overlap. Passes each…
If 2% of the battery is 2% of 3000mAh (which is probably a generous over-estimate of the phone's capacity), that means the phone pulls ~60mA. You can buy a 60,000 mAh battery (or build one) for about $50, which would buy this device 10,000 hours, or round it down and call it 1 year.
I know eBikes are a massive step up from laptop batteries (seemingly better for the density too somehow?)
Re: Bop Spotter
#356Re: Bop Spotter
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perfect is the enemy of good. I've found it's much better to get a project up and running as an "MVP" than to chase the perfect until the details suck all the fun out of it.
I don't see what that has to do with what I said. Chasing an MVP doesn't have to involve disrespecting people's privacy and recording without consent. There are many worse violators than this, but it is what it is.
Fixing this one installation wouldn't fix all the rest (example: Shot spotter)
Re: Bop Spotter
#358Earlier quoted context omitted.
Any volume which makes your music become my music too without my consent is at asshole level.
Have you considered those who are hard of hearing? Should they be made to drive their vehicles in silence?
If we cared more for the hard of hearing we would reduce music volumes and make restaurants quieter. Our society doesn't care even though it pretends to.
Re: Bop Spotter
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
A bit disappointing that this sends audio recordings to a server. Even if it's not the intention, that leaves so much possibility for abuse. Why not use a Pixel phone with on-device song matching? It also keeps history on device. Getting that data out of the app might be a little tricky, but should be possible.
Perfect is the enemy of good. I've found it's much better to get a project up and running as an "MVP" than to chase the perfect until the details suck all the fun out of it.
Re: Bop Spotter
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
>they're not legally entitled to much privacy in these places. While I think this is a really cool project, I also agree with the privacy issues. CA is a two party consent state, and recording a conversation (which this is likely to do) like this is likely illegal. While a person might not have a expectation of privacy about someone just hearing the conversation, they are protected by law if they are recorded without…
There is no right to privacy in a public space. It is not illegal to record an area where individuals would not have the expectation of privacy, even without their consent. Therefore, this is not illegal. If this were a restaurant, that would be a different story.
No legally protected right. This doesn't mean it is ethical, and given that it is a protected right in other jurisdictions shows it deserves more consideration and should not be hand waived away.
If "it's legal" is the argument being used to defense a behavior, it's safe to assume it's not actually a good one.