Live data from Hacker News

AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

techcrunch.com

351–360 of 874 posts

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never understood the american secrecy about SSN... it should be a "username" not a "password"... In my country you can calculate our own national id (mix of date of birth, autoincreasing number by each birth that day + 1 checksum number), and if you do/have any kind of personal business, your personal tax number has to be written everywhere, on every receipt you hand out or anything you buy as a business. Somehow k…

I never understood the american secrecy about SSN... it should be a "username" not a "password"... The problem is banks/financial services do a piss-poor job validating identity when issuing credit/opening accounts. "Oh, you provided an address, a SSN, and [non-random, easily discoverable personal fact]! Sure, here's a CC with a $150k limit!" It's not the leak that's the problem; it's the ease with which that leaked…

[deleted]

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#352

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The new HN voting mechanism is broken imo. Useless posts and articles of low value make it to the frontpage but valuable ones get shadowed.

There's a new voting mechanism?

And where do we go to find out about these things? Is there a discussion space or something?

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#353
post #319

The root cause (1) is the data store should not have been available on the underlay network. Anything connected to an underlay network is a ticking time bomb. Any servers or admins which need to talk to the data store should instead use a private overlay (2) network. Any users (likely just remote admins) should do the same. (1) Same root cause as 99% of breaches and yet it is too often swept under the rug while we fo…

It seems from the article that AT&T uploaded data to a cloud service, protected by username and password, and someone obtained credentials or breached the cloud service.

What does that have to do with 'underlay networks' and wow is that "the root cause of 99% of breaches"?

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#355
post #317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not their fault. Snowflake was breached. And the data was with Snowflake.

Snowflake wasn't breached. A Snowflake database belonging to AT&T was breached.

You are right apparently.

> hundreds of Snowflake customer credentials ... of staffers who have access to their employer’s Snowflake environment ... credentials available online linked to Snowflake environments suggests an ongoing risk to customers who have not yet changed their passwords or enabled MFA.

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#357
post #321

@dang Could I ask why this topic gets systematically penalized in the HN ranking? There have been 15 submissions so far, I assume partly because previous submissions are not shown on the main page so HN users keep re-submitting it. This topic is both newsworthy and high interest. (I was going to link to the 14 other submissions but the list is too long and it'd just come across as obnoxious.)

At the moment this is #1 on the frontpage.

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#359
"It remains unclear why so many major corporations persist in the belief that it is somehow acceptable to store so much sensitive customer data with so few security protections."

It's because there are almost no consequences to them if they lose the customer data, beyond a day or two of bad press. If they faced significant fines, fines that get worse the more sensitive the data is, then they'd have an incentive to do better.

Re: AT&T says criminals stole phone records of 'nearly all' customers in data breach

#360
post #70

AT&T stock has already bounced back from much of the initial -2.6% drop this morning, so the market thinks AT&T is immune. Meanwhile Snowflake is -3.9% down (they have many other customers than AT&T). https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/T https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/SNOW

I never got the impression that the market ever cares about data breaches. It seems most companies are rarely held financially responsible for data breaches anyway. I would bet any effects you’re seeing in stocks is unrelated to this news.

The market doesn't care precisely because there is never any accountability.
Post reply on HN